Cited by 3,018Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure

Walsh, Christopher J., Roy, Allison H., Feminella, Jack W., Cottingham, Peter D., Groffman, Peter M., Morgan, Raymond P.·2005·Journal of the North American Benthological Society

Abstract

Abstract The term “urban stream syndrome” describes the consistently observed ecological degradation of streams draining urban land. This paper reviews recent literature to describe symptoms of the syndrome, explores mechanisms driving the syndrome, and identifies appropriate goals and methods for ecological restoration of urban streams. Symptoms of the urban stream syndrome include a flashier hydrograph, elevated concentrations of nutrients and contaminants, altered channel morphology, and reduced biotic richness, with increased dominance of tolerant species. More research is needed before generalizations can be made about urban effects on stream ecosystem processes, but reduced nutrient uptake has been consistently reported. The mechanisms driving the syndrome are complex and interactive, but most impacts can be ascribed to a few major large-scale sources, primarily urban stormwater runoff delivered to streams by hydraulically efficient drainage systems. Other stressors, such as combined or sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant effluents, and legacy pollutants (long-lived pollutants from earlier land uses) can obscure the effects of stormwater runoff. Most research on urban impacts to streams has concentrated on correlations between instream ecological metrics and total catchment imperviousness. Recent research shows that some of the variance in such relationships can be explained by the distance between the stream reach and urban land, or by the hydraulic efficiency of stormwater drainage. The mechanisms behind such patterns require experimentation at the catchment scale to identify the best management approaches to conservation and restoration of streams in urban catchments. Remediation of stormwater impacts is most likely to be achieved through widespread application of innovative approaches to drainage design. Because humans dominate urban ecosystems, research on urban stream ecology will require a broadening of stream ecological research to integrate with social, behavioral, and economic research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1899/04-028.1

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces can be an important source of diffuse pollution contributing to the degradation of urban surface waters.

    “Urban stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces can be an important source of diffuse pollution contributing to the degradation of urban surface waters [1,2].”
  • The impacts of urbanization on streams have been analyzed in detail and described as the 'Urban Stream Syndrome'.

    “The impacts of urbanization on streams has been analyzed in detail, described by some authors as the 'Urban Stream Syndrome' [6].”
  • These dysfunctions have been described as the 'urban river syndrome', and their nature can vary with climatic zones.

    “These dysfunctions have been described as the”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
Corresponding author
  • Walsh, Christopher J.
  • Roy, Allison H.
  • Feminella, Jack W.
  • Cottingham, Peter D.
  • Groffman, Peter M.
  • Morgan, Raymond P.
Venue
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Published
2005-09
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
706-723
ISSN
  • 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-237X
OpenAlex
W2170690812
Cited by
3,018
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 201 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 229 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 186 · 2017: 168 · 2016: 157 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 118
FWCI
48.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the North American Benthological Society (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
urban stream syndrome, urban rivers, stormwater runoff, stormwater drainage systems, impervious surfaces, nutrient loading, contaminants, channel morphology, stream restoration, sewer overflows, wastewater treatment effluent, legacy contaminants, catchment scale, urbanization impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review