Cited by 108Spatial Cognition and NavigationVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty

Chen, Chien-Hsiung, Chang, Wen-Chih, Chang, Wen-Te·2009·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.07.003

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C.-H., Chang, W.-C., & Chang, W.-T.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Wen-Te
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
220-226
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978428418
Cited by
107
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
wayfinding, gender differences, guide signs, wayfinding strategies, egocentric navigation, allocentric navigation, task difficulty, virtual reality navigation, 3D navigation, navigation time, wayfinding performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review