The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
SITGREAVES, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 11,425
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P., & Hanson, C. (2007) · Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Digital Repository (Centre for Environmental Data Analysis) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7356334 · Cited by 9,136
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657288 · Cited by 4,524
Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes
(1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07551-2 · Cited by 3,216
A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work
Schwartz, S. H. (1999) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x · Cited by 3,102
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · Cited by 3,037
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
Schwarz, N. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93 · Cited by 2,846
Cited by
Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001 · Cited by 1,408
Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationMilfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006 · Cited by 441
Self-citationSaphores, J.-D. M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2012) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.003 · Cited by 392
Age and environmental sustainability: a meta-analysis
M. Wiernik, B., S. Ones, D., & Dilchert, S. (2013) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-07-2013-0221 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-158
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077359158
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003
- The paper
- Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
