Cited by 274Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsEmbodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and Synchronization

Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age

Iachini, Tina, Coello, Yann, Frassinetti, Francesca, Senese, Vincenzo Paolo, Galante, Francesco, Ruggiero, Gennaro·2016·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.004

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both reachability and comfort distances strongly depended on the context.

    “Both reachability and comfort distances strongly depended on the context”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Iachini et al., 2016

  • When participants performed the stop distance and reachability paradigms in their passive version (being approached), both measures were larger than in the active situation.

    “When participants performed the stop distance and reachability paradigms in their passive version (being approached), both measures were larger than in the active situation”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Iachini et al., 2016

  • Interpersonal distance is typically reduced towards kids; people also prefer to enter into personal space of short, but not tall others.

    “Interpersonal distance is typically reduced towards kids (Iachini et al., 2016), people also preferring to enter into personal space of short, but not tall others (Caplan & Goldman, 1981).”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Iachini et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Iachini, Tina
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
45
Pages
154-164
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2223048051
Cited by
274
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
23.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
peripersonal space, personal space, proxemics, gender differences, age differences, virtual reality, social interaction, motor control, ecological validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review