Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retirement consumption puzzle in Japan: Insights from pension and senior worker employment policy changes

Kitamura, Tomoki, Adachi, Yoshimi·2024·The Journal of the Economics of Ageing

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeoa.2024.100536

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kitamura, 2018, Effectiveness of the increase of pension age and the revision of elderly labor protection law in Japan, Research Memoir of the Statistics, 75, 1
  2. Kondo, 2014, Did the legal obligation to institute a system for continued employment really increase elderly employment? The policy evaluation of the elderly employment stabilization law, Japan. J. Labour Stud., 642, 13

Metadata

Authors
Kitamura, T., & Adachi, Y.
Venue
The Journal of the Economics of Ageing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
29
Pages
100536
ISSN
2212-828X
Cited by
3
References
39
Language
en
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retirement consumption puzzle in Japan: Insights from pension and senior worker employment policy changes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jeoa.2024.100536
The paper
Kitamura, T., & Adachi, Y. (2024). Retirement consumption puzzle in Japan: Insights from pension and senior worker employment policy changes. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2024.100536

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.