Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 723

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables

Open access
Sanderson, Eleanor, Windmeijer, Frank·2016·Journal of Econometrics

Abstract

We consider testing for weak instruments in a model with multiple endogenous variables. Unlike Stock and Yogo (2005), who considered a weak instruments problem where the rank of the matrix of reduced form parameters is near zero, here we consider a weak instruments problem of a near rank reduction of one in the matrix of reduced form parameters. For example, in a two-variable model, we consider weak instrument asymptotics of the form [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are the parameters in the two reduced-form equations, [Formula: see text] is a vector of constants and [Formula: see text] is the sample size. We investigate the use of a conditional first-stage [Formula: see text]-statistic along the lines of the proposal by Angrist and Pischke (2009) and show that, unless [Formula: see text], the variance in the denominator of their [Formula: see text]-statistic needs to be adjusted in order to get a correct asymptotic distribution when testing the hypothesis [Formula: see text]. We show that a corrected conditional [Formula: see text]-statistic is equivalent to the Cragg and Donald (1993) minimum eigenvalue rank test statistic, and is informative about the maximum total relative bias of the 2SLS estimator and the Wald tests size distortions. When [Formula: see text] in the two-variable model, or when there are more than two endogenous variables, further information over and above the Cragg-Donald statistic can be obtained about the nature of the weak instrument problem by computing the conditional first-stage [Formula: see text]-statistics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cragg, 1993, Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variables models, Econometric Theory, 9, 222, 10.1017/S0266466600007519 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kleibergen, 2006, Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition, J. Econometrics, 133, 97, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Olea, 2013, A robust test for weak instruments, J. Bus. Econom. Statist., 31, 358, 10.1080/00401706.2013.806694 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Rothenberg, 1984, Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics, 881, 10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02007-9 · DOI

Cited by

See all 723

Metadata

Authors
Sanderson, E., & Windmeijer, F.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
190
Issue
2
Pages
212-221
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108150034
Cited by
723
References
2
FWCI
30.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.004
The paper
Sanderson, E., & Windmeijer, F. (2016). A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.