Cited by 20Traditional Chinese Medicine StudiesEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesHistory of Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

What's past is prologue: Chinese medicine and the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections

Barrett, Penelope, Flower, Andrew, Lo, Vivienne·2015·Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has a recorded history of over 2000 years that may be used to authenticate and guide modern treatments for disease, and also identify neglected but potentially useful treatment strategies. However this process is often based on over-simplistic conceptions of tradition and history that fail to take into account the dynamic nature of 'traditions' and underestimate the importance of contextual factors in their interpretation. Materials and methods As part of a process of defining good practice for a clinical trial of CHM for recurrent urinary tract infections, a selective review of classical Chinese medical texts was undertaken to investigate the historical treatment of urinary diseases specified by the traditional category of Lin diseases. Results The historical review provided interesting insights into the evolution and meaning of Lin diseases and how pertinent data may be found, precisely, outside the boundaries of the categories on which the original investigation was premised. Although there were interesting parallels and continuities in the classical and modern understandings of the aetiology, pathophysiology and treatment of urinary diseases, there were also important divergences. Conclusions It became apparent that, in the search for 'traditional' herbs to treat a particular modern syndrome it is essential to contextualise remedies, including as far as possible the intertextual, social, cultural, and gender context, and conditions of practice. Historical ethnopharmacology adds a level of subtlety and complexity to over-simplistic attempts at bioprospecting. Some insights that emerged from this historical review could inform the proposed clinical trial but these have had to be filtered through the constraints of modern regulatory procedures. Further research is required on how best to integrate the wealth of data that exists in historical texts with the desire to produce effective herbal products for the modern world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jep.2014.11.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EU regulations are overly restrictive and serve to prevent fair trials of formulas that have been recorded in Chinese remedy books for thousands of years.

    “This conclusion echoes the fi ndings of Barrett et al. (2015) that the EU regulations are overly restrictive and serve to prevent fair trials of formulas that have been recorded in Chinese remedy books for thousands of years.”

    From Potent substances—An introduction (2015) · cites this paper as Barrett et al. (2015)

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Sun Simiao 孫思邈, c. 652, 2007. Beiji qianjin yaofang 備急千金要方 (Emergency Prescriptions Worth a Thousand Gold Pieces). In: Wilms, S. (Ed.), Sun Si-Miăo, Bèi Jí Qiān Jīn Yào Fāng: Essential Prescriptions worth a Thousand in Gold for Every Emergency, vols. 2–4. The Chinese Medicine Database, Portland, OR.
  2. Buenz, 2004, Techniques: bioprospecting historical herbal texts by hunting for new leads in old tomes, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 25, 494, 10.1016/j.tips.2004.07.003 · DOI
  3. Buenz, 2007, Hold on to your memories: how recent findings will impact plant-based drug discovery, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 114, 279, 10.1016/j.jep.2007.08.018 · DOI
  4. Flower, 2012, A prospective case series exploring the role of Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections, European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 4, e421, 10.1016/j.eujim.2012.05.004 · DOI
  5. Heinrich, 2006, Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology – interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 107, 157, 10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.035 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Leonti, 2011, The future is written: impact of scripts on the cognition, selection, knowledge and transmission of medicinal plant use and its implications for Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 134, 542, 10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.017 · DOI
  7. Li Jingwei李經緯, et al. (Eds.), 2006. Zhongyi da cidian 中醫大辭典 (Great Dictionary of Chinese Medicine. 2nd edn. Renmin weisheng chubanshe, Beijing.
  8. Li Yuanyan 李媛媛, 2010. Lüejie “shilin” 略解“石淋” (Brief explanation of shi lin [urolithic stranguria]). Zhonghua Yishi Zazhi 40 (2), 187–189.
  9. Mawangdui Hanmu boshu zhengli xiaozu 馬王堆漢墓帛書整理小組 (Eds.), 1979. Mawangdui Hanmu boshu 52 bingfang 馬王堆漢墓帛書五十二病方 (Fifty-two medical recipes from the Mawangdui Han-Dynasty Silk Manuscripts). Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing.
  10. Riegel, 2013, Curing the incurable, Early China, 35, 225, 10.1017/S0362502800000493 · DOI
  11. Twitchett, D., Fairbank, J.K. (Eds.), 2008. The Ch’in and Han Empires (221 B.C.–A.D) (The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Wang Wentao 王文涛, 2014. ‘Long’ bing yu Qin Handai shehui jiuzhu ‘癃’病与秦汉社会救助 (Long illness and Qin and Han dynasty social welfare). In: Zhongguo Qin Han shi yanjiuhui (Eds.), Qin Han shilun cong 秦汉史论丛. Conference Proceedings, Chengdu, pp. 336–347.
  13. Zhang Yanchang 張延昌, Zhu Jianping 朱建平 (Eds.), 1996. Wuwei Handai yijian yanjiu 武威漢代醫簡研究 (Studies of the Han Dynasty Bamboo-Slip Medical Texts from Wuwei). Yuanzineng chubanshe, Beijing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, P., Flower, A., & Lo, V.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Penelope
Venue
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
167
Pages
86-96
ISSN
0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064123775
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
Keywords
Chinese herbal medicine, recurrent urinary tract infection, classical Chinese medical texts, history of Chinese medicine, ethnopharmacology, bioprospecting, traditional Chinese medicine, clinical trial design, gender and medicine
MeSH terms
Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Phytotherapy, Recurrence, Urinary Tract Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review