Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology—Interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences
Abstract
In this paper we use three disparate examples to highlight the relevance of historical methods in the context of ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. Unfortunately, in ethnopharmacology we have only very few examples where such historical depth is possible. On the other hand the first hand data available through ethnopharmacological research, may be of relevance for interpreting historical information. Three distinct methods were used successfully in the retrospective exploration of diachronic data. In order to gain an insight into historical developments in the use of plant species and evolution of pharmacopoeias we used a botanico-historical approach (Rosmarinus officinalis), one that combines linguistic and statistical methods (Popoluca/Mixe), and one that uses historical documentary evidence (Ch'orti). We hope that this methodological discussion encourages a wider use of such historical methods in ethnopharmacology and related areas of research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is still a lack of research in which the historical depth and the dynamics of traditional uses can be analysed.
“there is still a lack of research wherein the historical depth and the dynamics of traditional uses can be analysed (Heinrich et al., 2006).”
From Potent substances—An introduction (2015) · cites this paper as Heinrich et al., 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Asian Medicinal Plants’ Production and Utilization Potentials: A Review
Astutik, S., Pretzsch, J., & Ndzifon Kimengsi, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11195483 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Plant identification credibility in ethnobotany: A closer look at Polish ethnographic studies
Łuczaj, Ł. J. (2010) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-36 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Potent substances—An introduction
Lo, V., Kadetz, P., Datiles, M. J., & Heinrich, M. (2015) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2014.12.058 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Heinrich, M., Kufer, J., Leonti, M., & Pardo-de-Santayana, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Heinrich, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-160
- ISSN
- 0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160605068
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Linguistic and Cultural Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
- Keywords
- ethnobotany, ethnopharmacology, historical method, pharmacopoeia, Rosmarinus officinalis, Popoluca, Mixe
- MeSH terms
- Ethnobotany, Ethnopharmacology, Rosmarinus, Plant Preparations, Interdisciplinary Communication, History, 15th Century, History, Ancient, History, Medieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review