Cited by 210Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesLinguistic and Cultural StudiesPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology—Interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences

Heinrich, Michael, Kufer, Johanna, Leonti, Marco, Pardo-de-Santayana, Manuel·2006·Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Abstract

In this paper we use three disparate examples to highlight the relevance of historical methods in the context of ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. Unfortunately, in ethnopharmacology we have only very few examples where such historical depth is possible. On the other hand the first hand data available through ethnopharmacological research, may be of relevance for interpreting historical information. Three distinct methods were used successfully in the retrospective exploration of diachronic data. In order to gain an insight into historical developments in the use of plant species and evolution of pharmacopoeias we used a botanico-historical approach (Rosmarinus officinalis), one that combines linguistic and statistical methods (Popoluca/Mixe), and one that uses historical documentary evidence (Ch'orti). We hope that this methodological discussion encourages a wider use of such historical methods in ethnopharmacology and related areas of research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is still a lack of research in which the historical depth and the dynamics of traditional uses can be analysed.

    “there is still a lack of research wherein the historical depth and the dynamics of traditional uses can be analysed (Heinrich et al., 2006).”

    From Potent substances—An introduction (2015) · cites this paper as Heinrich et al., 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinrich, M., Kufer, J., Leonti, M., & Pardo-de-Santayana, M.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heinrich, Michael
Venue
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
157-160
ISSN
0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160605068
Cited by
210
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Linguistic and Cultural Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
ethnobotany, ethnopharmacology, historical method, pharmacopoeia, Rosmarinus officinalis, Popoluca, Mixe
MeSH terms
Ethnobotany, Ethnopharmacology, Rosmarinus, Plant Preparations, Interdisciplinary Communication, History, 15th Century, History, Ancient, History, Medieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review