Cited by 32Agriculture and Agroindustry StudiesGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactOrganic Food and Agriculture

Quality Control of Goji (Fruits of Lycium Barbarum L. And L. Chinense Mill.): A Value Chain Analysis Perspective

Open access
Yao, Ruyu, Heinrich, Michael, Wang, Zigui, Weckerle, Caroline S.·2018·Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance Goji (fruits of Lycium barbarum L. and L. chinense Mill., Solanaceae) have been used as a traditional food and medicine for hundreds of years in Asian countries and are now consumed globally. Quality of herbal medicines is critical for safe use and has been shown to be affected by value chains. Aim of the study Using a value chain (VC) framework, we aim at understanding the influence of different VC types on goji quality and revenue of stakeholders. Materials and methods Participant observation and semi-structured interviews were conducted during five months of fieldwork in the main production areas in China with a total of 65 stakeholders. Quality of goji, behaviour and financial performance of stakeholders was documented and analysed for different VCs. Results Ten different types of VCs were identified. VCs with vertical integration and horizontal collaboration were found to have a more coherent quality control and better goji quality as well as improved stakeholders' financial performance. Vertical integration at different levels was found for independent farmer-based VCs, horizontal collaboration was found in the cooperative-based VCs. Full vertically integrated VCs were found in large-scale production. Conclusions Goji quality and stakeholders' revenues are linked with different types of VCs which mirror stakeholders' behaviour driven by target markets. Considering their positive influence on quality and revenues, well-developed vertically integrated value chains are likely to become more important in the near future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jep.2018.06.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, R., Heinrich, M., Wang, Z., & Weckerle, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Yao, Ruyu
Venue
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
224
Pages
349-358
ISSN
0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808147955
Cited by
32
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Chinese Government Scholarship (201306910001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
Lycium barbarum, Lycium chinense, value chain, quality control, herbal medicine, vertical integration, horizontal cooperation, agricultural cooperatives, traditional medicine, food and medicine
MeSH terms
Stakeholder Participation, China, Fruit, Humans, Pesticide Residues, Quality Control, Sulfur, Lycium, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review