Cited by 23Malaria Research and ControlPhytochemical compounds biological activitiesEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies

In vitro reduction of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes: Artemisia spp. tea infusions vs. artemisinin

Open access
Snider, Danielle, Weathers, Pamela J.·2021·Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance Artemisia annua has a long history of use in Southeast Asia where it was used to treat "fever", and A. afra has a similar history in southern Africa. Since their discovery, A. annua use, in particular, has expanded globally with millions of people using the plant in therapeutic tea infusions, mainly to treat malaria.Aim of the study In this study, we used in vitro studies to query if and how A. annua and A. afra tea infusions being used across the globe affect asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasites, and their sexual gametocytes.Materials and methods P. falciparumstrain NF54 was grown in vitro, synchronized, and induced to form gametocytes using N-acetylglucosamine. Cultures during asexual, early, and late stage gametocytogenesis were treated with artemisinin, methylene blue, and A. annua and A. afra tea infusions (5 g DW/L) using cultivars that contained 0-283 μM artemisinin. Asexual parasitemia and gametocytemia were analyzed microscopically. Gametocyte morphology also was scored. Markers of early (PfGEXP5) and late stage (Pfs25) gametocyte gene expression also were measured using RT-qPCR.Results Both A. annua and A. afra tea infusions reduced gametocytemia in vitro, and the effect was mainly artemisinin dependent. Expression levels of both marker genes were reduced and also occurred with the effect mainly attributed to artemisinin content of four tested Artemisia cultivars. Tea infusions of both species also inhibited asexual parasitemia and although mainly artemisinin dependent, there was a weak antiparasitic effect from artemisinin-deficient A. afra.Conclusions These results showed that A. annua and to a lesser extent, A. afra, inhibited parasitemia and gametocytemia in vitro.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113638

Cites

45 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent positive clinical test in humans suggested A. annua is quite effective at eliminating various stages of the malaria parasite including gametocytes, which has been verified in vitro.

    “Traditionally A. annua was used as tea infusion and a recent positive clinical test in humans (Munyangi et al. 2019) suggested the plant is quite effective at eliminating various stages of the malaria parasite including gametocytes, which has been now verified in vitro (Snider and Weathers 2021).”

    From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Snider and Weathers 2021

    The Abstract’s Conclusions report that A. annua inhibited asexual parasitemia and gametocytemia in vitro, supporting the in-vitro portion attributed to Snider and Weathers. But the Results section on gametocytes reports no significant reduction relative to the control for late-stage gametocytes by microscopy, so the paper does not verify elimination across the various stages claimed. The human clinical test is cited to Munyangi et al., not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snider, D., & Weathers, P. J.
Affiliations
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Weathers, Pamela J.
Venue
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
268
Pages
113638
ISSN
0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109845262
Cited by
23
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical compounds biological activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Keywords
Plasmodium falciparum, gametocytes, Artemisia annua, Artemisia afra, tea infusion, artemisinin, antimalarial activity, gametocytogenesis, Pfs25, traditional medicine
MeSH terms
Germ Cells, Plant Extracts, Plasmodium falciparum, Tea, Artemisia, Artemisinins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review