The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies using activated carbon
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the largest anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) on the planet contributing to the global warming. Currently, there are three capture technologies of trapping CO2 from the flue gas and they are pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-fuel combustion. Among these, the post-combustion is widely popular as it can be retrofitted for a short to medium term without encountering any significant technology risks or changes. Activated carbon is widely used as a universal separation medium with series of advantages compared to the first generation capture processes based on amine-based scrubbing which are inherently energy intensive. The goal of this review is to elucidate the three CO2 capture technologies with a focus on the use of activated carbon (AC) as an adsorbent for post-combustion anthropogenic CO2 flue gas capture prior to emission to atmosphere. Furthermore, this coherent review summarizes the recent ongoing research on the preparation of activated carbon from various sources to provide a profound understanding on the current progress to highlight the challenges of the CO2 mitigation efforts along with the mathematical modeling of CO2 capture. AC is widely seen as a universal adsorbent due to its unique properties such as high surface area and porous texture. Other applications of AC in the removal of contaminants from flue gas, heavy metal and organic compounds, as a catalyst and catalyst support and in the electronics and electroplating industry are also discussed in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials
D'Alessandro, D. M., Smit, B., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000431 · Cited by 4,046
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review
Yang, H., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Gupta, R., Slimane, R. B., Bland, A. E., & Wright, I. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(08)60002-9 · Cited by 2,087
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes
Merkel, T. C., Lin, H., Wei, X., & Baker, R. (2010) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041 · Cited by 1,657
CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends
Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., & Borgna, A. (2011) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c0ee00064g · Cited by 1,611
Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation
Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F. (2005) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,542
Separation of CO2 from Flue Gas: A Review
Aaron, D., & Tsouris, C. (2005) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1081/ss-200042244 · Cited by 1,525
A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites
Mittal, G., Dhand, V., Rhee, K. Y., Park, S.-J., & Lee, W. R. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 · Cited by 1,371
A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption
Shafeeyan, M. S., Daud, W. M. A. W., Houshmand, A., & Shamiri, A. (2010) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.006 · Cited by 1,128
Cited by
Advancements in carbon capture technologies: A review
Dubey, A., & Arora, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133932 · Cited by 303
CO2 capture by adsorption on biomass-derived activated char: A review.
Goel, C., Mohan, S., & Dinesha, P. (2021) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149296 · Cited by 206
Recent advances in biochar-based adsorbents for CO2 capture
Guo, S., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Sun, Y., & Liu, L. (2022) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100059 · Cited by 201
Straw and wood based biochar for CO2 capture: Adsorption performance and governing mechanisms
Cao, L., Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Xiang, W., Wang, R., Ding, F., Hong, P., & Gao, B. (2022) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120592 · Cited by 196
Carbon Capture Technologies: A Review on Technology Readiness Level
Hekmatmehr, H., Esmaeili, A., Pourmahdi, M., Atashrouz, S., Abedi, A., Ali Abuswer, M., Nedeljkovic, D., Latifi, M., Farag, S., & Mohaddespour, A. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130898 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, A., Okolie, J. A., Abdelrasoul, A., Niu, C., & Dalai, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 46-63
- ISSN
- 1001-0742 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2924550391
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies using activated carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jes.2019.03.014
- The paper
- Mukherjee, A., Okolie, J. A., Abdelrasoul, A., Niu, C., & Dalai, A. K. (2019). Review of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies using activated carbon. Journal of Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.03.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
