Cited by 1,542Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAdvanced Power Generation TechnologiesCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing

Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation

Buhre, B.J.P., Elliott, L.K., Sheng, C.D., Gupta, R.P., Wall, T.F.·2005·Progress in Energy and Combustion Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pecs.2005.07.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Wall, T.F.
Venue
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
283-307
ISSN
0360-1285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011608289
Cited by
1,542
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 118
FWCI
32.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Energy and Combustion Science (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Power Generation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Keywords
oxy-fuel combustion, coal-fired power generation, CO2 capture, carbon sequestration, NOx reduction, flue gas recirculation, greenhouse gas emissions, pilot-scale test, technology assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review