The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
White and Black American children's implicit intergroup bias
Open accessAbstract
Despite a decline in explicit prejudice, adults and children from majority groups (e.g., White Americans) often express bias implicitly, as assessed by the Implicit Association Test. In contrast, minority-group (e.g., Black American) adults on average show no bias on the IAT. In the present research, representing the first empirical investigation of whether Black children’s IAT responses parallel those of Black adults, we examined implicit bias in 7–11-year-old White and Black American children. Replicating previous findings with adults, whereas White children showed a robust ingroup bias, Black children showed no bias. Additionally, we investigated the role of valuing status in the development of implicit bias. For Black children, explicit preference for high status predicted implicit outgroup bias: Black children who explicitly expressed high preference for rich (vs. poor) people showed an implicit preference for Whites comparable in magnitude to White children’s ingroup bias. Implications for research on intergroup bias are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Development of Implicit Attitudes: Evidence of Race Evaluations From Ages 6 and 10 and Adulthood
Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x · Cited by 791
Cited by
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620927709 · Cited by 1,049
Automaticity in social-cognitive processes
Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002 · Cited by 375
Children Use Wealth Cues to Evaluate Others
Shutts, K., Brey, E. L., Dornbusch, L. A., Slywotzky, N., & Olson, K. R. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149360 · Cited by 187
“We can only speculate why White participants’ scores on the race/wealth matching task exceeded chance, while Black participants’ scores did not (but see [25], for a similar finding with older participants tested on implicit measures).”
ResultSelf-citationChildren’s racial bias in perceptions of others’ pain
Dore, R. A., Hoffman, K. M., Lillard, A. S., & Trawalter, S. (2014) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12038 · Cited by 88
Fietta, V., Zecchinato, F., Stasi, B. D., Polato, M., & Monaro, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2021.3125280 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Newheiser, A.-K., & Olson, K. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 264-270
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989536917
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: White and Black American children's implicit intergroup bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.011
- The paper
- Newheiser, A.-K., & Olson, K. R. (2012). White and Black American children's implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.