Cited by 343Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational choice with status quo bias

Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, Ok, Efe A.·2005·Journal of Economic Theory

DOI 10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.007

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.007

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
Simon, H. A. (1955) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884852 · Cited by 15,877
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
The Handbook of experimental economics
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1645 · Cited by 3,780
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194
The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301753265543 · Cited by 3,119
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D. J., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009 · Cited by 2,870
Psychology and Economics
Rabin, M. (1997) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,463
The Handbook of Experimental Economics
(2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvzsmff5 · Cited by 1,171

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

6 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Sorted by citations

A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences
Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133 · Cited by 2,728
Sequentially Rationalizable Choice
Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1824 · Cited by 378
(A,f): Choice with Frames1
Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2008) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00510.x · Cited by 297
Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing
Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2006) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdq016 · Cited by 291
Enablers and Inhibitors of AI-Powered Voice Assistants: A Dual-Factor Approach by Integrating the Status Quo Bias and Technology Acceptance Model
Balakrishnan, J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., & Boy, F. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10203-y · Cited by 215
When more is less: Limited consideration
Lleras, J. S., Masatlıoĝlu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2017) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2017.04.004 · Cited by 199
Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences
Eliaz, K., & Ok, E. A. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.06.007 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
CATEGORIZE THEN CHOOSE: BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL CHOICE AND WELFARE
Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01078.x · Cited by 177
Revealed (P)Reference Theory
Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20111046 · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Bias in Favor of the Status Quo
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x · Cited by 172
On the multi-utility representation of preference relations
Evren, Ö., & Ok, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.07.003 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Limited attention and status quo bias
Dean, M., Kıbrıs, Ö., & Masatlıoĝlu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2017.01.009 · Cited by 139
Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
Campbell, D., & Erdem, S. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0324-6 · Cited by 137
Can indifference make the world greener?
Egebark, J. H., & Ekström, M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.004 · Cited by 126
A Measure of Rationality and Welfare
Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/683838 · Cited by 128
Incomplete Preferences Under Uncertainty: Indecisiveness in Beliefs versus Tastes
Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2012) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta8040 · Cited by 115
Self-citation
A Canonical Model of Choice with Initial Endowments
Masatlıoĝlu, Y., & Ok, E. A. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt037 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Anchored preference relations
Sagi, J. S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.01.009 · Cited by 101
Consistency, Choice, and Rationality
Bossert, W., & Suzumura, K. (2010) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjhzq9s · Cited by 98
Choice by lexicographic semiorders
Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te679 · Cited by 94
Search, choice, and revealed preference
Caplin, A., & Dean, M. R. W. (2011) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te592 · Cited by 94
Managing complexity in modern farming*
Kingwell, R. (2011) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00528.x · Cited by 89
Choice by sequential procedures
Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2012) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.09.006 · Cited by 88
Choice by iterative search
Masatlıoĝlu, Y., & Nakajima, D. (2013) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te1014 · Cited by 83
Reference-Dependent Residential Location Choice Model within a Relocation Context
Habib, M. A., & Miller, E. J. (2009) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2133-10 · Cited by 88
Status quo bias, multiple priors and uncertainty aversion
Ortoleva, P. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.11.007 · Cited by 79
A theory of reference-dependent behavior
Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2008) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-008-0387-z · Cited by 75
Valuing Urban Green Space: Hypothetical Alternatives and the Status Quo
Bullock, C. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560701712242 · Cited by 68
The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences
Dhingra, N., Gorn, Z., Kener, A., & Dana, J. D. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001844 · Cited by 63
Revealed Incomplete Preferences Under Uncertainty
Cettolin, E., & Riedl, A. M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2019.03.002 · Cited by 66
Beyond the visual dimension: Using ideal type narratives to analyse people's assessments of landscape scenarios
Soliva, R., & Hunziker, M. (2008) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.007 · Cited by 59
Choice Complexity and Market Competition
Ran Spiegler, Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-070615-115216 · Cited by 55
Choosing not to choose: A meta-analysis of status quo effects in environmental valuations using choice experiments
Barreiro‐Hurlé, J., Espinosa, M., Paz, J. M. M., & Perni, Á. (2018) · Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales · doi:10.7201/earn.2018.01.04 · Cited by 52
Indecisiveness, Undesirability and Overload Revealed Through Rational Choice Deferral
Gerasímou, G. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12500 · Cited by 55
Social Comparison and Risk Taking Behavior
Gamba, A., Manzoni, E., & Stanca, L. (2014) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-016-9562-z · Cited by 52
Behavioral Implementation
de Clippel, G. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.10.2975 · Cited by 49
Reference-dependent utility with shifting reference points and incomplete preferences
Bleichrodt, H. (2007) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2007.04.003 · Cited by 49
Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels
Chen, W. Y., Liekens, I., & Broekx, S. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0885-5 · Cited by 48
Digital payments and GDP growth: A behavioural quantitative analysis
Birigozzi, A., Silva, C. D., & Luitel, P. (2025) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102768 · Cited by 50
Competitive Framing
Spiegler, R. (2014) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.6.3.35 · Cited by 42
DECISION TIME, CONSIDERATION TIME, AND STATUS QUO BIAS
Geng, S. (2015) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12239 · Cited by 46
Choice and individual welfare
Chambers, C. P., & Hayashi, T. (2012) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2012.01.013 · Cited by 41
Behavioral implications of shortlisting procedures
Tyson, C. J. (2012) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-012-0704-0 · Cited by 39
Rationalising Choice with Multi-self Models
Ambrus, A., & Rozen, K. (2013) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12103 · Cited by 39
Equilibrium behavior in markets and games: testable restrictions and identification
Carvajal, A. M., Ray, I., & Snyder, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2003.06.001 · Cited by 38
A decision inventory approach for improving decision support for climate change impact assessment and adaptation
Pyke, C. R., Bierwagen, B., Furlow, J., Gamble, J. L., Johnson, T., Julius, S. H., & West, J. M. (2007) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.05.001 · Cited by 37
Choice, deferral, and consistency
Costa‐Gomes, M. A., Cueva, C., Gerasímou, G., & Tejiščák, M. (2022) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe1806 · Cited by 35
From Free to Fee: Exploring the Antecedents of Consumer Intention to Switch to Paid Online Content
Li, Z., & Cheng, Y. (2014) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 35
Choice overload and asymmetric regret
Buturak, G., & Evren, Ö. (2017) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te2037 · Cited by 41
Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept are Probably Less Correlated Than You Think
Chapman, J., Dean, M. R. W., Ortoleva, P., Snowberg, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23954 · Cited by 35
Some Thoughts on the Principle of Revealed Preference
Rubinstein, A., & Salant, Y. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328318.003.0005 · Cited by 34
Satisficing Choice Procedures
Papi, M. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.04.017 · Cited by 34
Continuous multi-utility representations of preorders
Bosi, G., & Herden, G. (2012) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.05.001 · Cited by 34
Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover
Krupnikov, Y., & Shipan, C. R. (2018) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.32 · Cited by 33
An agent-based approach to financial stylized facts
Shimokawa, T., Suzuki, K., & Misawa, T. (2006) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2006.12.014 · Cited by 33
A simple model of two-stage choice
Horan, S. (2016) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2016.01.002 · Cited by 33
Asymmetric dominance, deferral, and status quo bias in a behavioral model of choice
Gerasímou, G. (2015) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-015-9499-7 · Cited by 33
Optimal Defaults with Normative Ambiguity
Goldin, J. S., & Reck, D. (2017) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00945 · Cited by 32
Revealed preferences and aspirations in warm glow theory
Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T. J., & Sandroni, A. (2012) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-012-0733-z · Cited by 32
Quantifying the consumer’s dependence on different information sources on acceptance of autonomous vehicles
Sharma, I., & Mishra, S. (2022) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.009 · Cited by 31
New approach methodologies in human health risk assessment across European regulatory frameworks: Status quo, barriers and drivers for regulatory acceptance and use
Bearth, A., Roth, N., Jansen, T., Holden, L., Čavoški, A., Consiglio, E. D., Hauzenberger, I., Lee, R., Mombelli, E., Tcheremenskaia, O., et al. (2025) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109279 · Cited by 30
Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations
Evren, Ö. (2014) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2014.02.003 · Cited by 30
Lagged beliefs and reference-dependent utility
Smith, A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.004 · Cited by 30
The Pygmalion Effect: An Agency Model with Reference Dependent PreferencesPreprint
Daido, K., & Itoh, H. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.676281 · Cited by 30
Randomization vs. Selection: How to Choose in the Absence of Preference?
Danan, É. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1116 · Cited by 29
Do I have to buy it now? A vehicle replacement model considering strategic consumer behavior
Choi, H., & Koo, Y. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.009 · Cited by 28
Indifference and incompleteness distinguished by rational trade
Mandler, M. (2008) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2008.11.009 · Cited by 26
Reference Point Heterogeneity
Terzi, A., Koedijk, K. C. G., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Pownall, R. A. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01347 · Cited by 27
Choosing with the worst in mind: A reference-dependent model
Tserenjigmid, G. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.001 · Cited by 28
Health insurance policy renewal: an exploration of reputation, performance, and affect to understand customer inertia
Kautish, P., Khare, A., & Sharma, R. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-021-00134-7 · Cited by 25
Context effects: A representation of choices from categories
Barbos, A. (2009) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2009.10.011 · Cited by 25
A theory of reference point formation
Kıbrıs, Ö., Masatlıoĝlu, Y., & Suleymanov, E. (2021) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-021-01392-3 · Cited by 25
The compromise effect in action: Lessons from a restaurant's menu
Pinger, P., Ruhmer, I., & Schumacher, H. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.04.017 · Cited by 28
The Behavior of Others as a Reference PointPreprint
Bogliacino, F., & Ortoleva, P. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2292011 · Cited by 25
What Drives Investors' Portfolio Choices? Separating Risk Preferences from Frictions
Choukhmane, T., & de Silva, T. (2025) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.70013 · Cited by 23
Understanding the reference effect
Masatlıoĝlu, Y., & Uler, N. (2013) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.07.009 · Cited by 23
Probabilistic dominance and status quo bias
Riella, G., & Teper, R. (2014) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2014.04.010 · Cited by 25
Monotone threshold representations
Frick, M. (2016) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te1547 · Cited by 27
Change and status quo in decisions with defaults: The effect of incidental emotions depends on the type of default
Shevchenko, Y., von Helversen, B., & Scheibehenne, B. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005817 · Cited by 22
Satisficing with a variable threshold
Kovach, M., & Ülkü, L. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.12.005 · Cited by 22
Non‐Deteriorating Choice
Bossert, W., & Sprumont, Y. (2008) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00671.x · Cited by 22
The Behavior of Other as a Reference PointPreprint
Bogliacino, F., & Ortoleva, P. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2653343 · Cited by 21
Preferred personal equilibrium and simple choices
Freeman, D. J. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.016 · Cited by 20
Efficient and non-deteriorating choice
Bossert, W., & Sprumont, Y. (2003) · Mathematical Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-4896(03)00021-0 · Cited by 20
Choosing on influence
Cuhadaroglu, T. (2015) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te2170 · Cited by 20
Two Comments on the Principle of Revealed PreferencePreprint
Rubinstein, A., & Salant, Y. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 19
Becker random behavior and the as-if defense of rational choice theory in demand analysis
Moscati, I., & Tubaro, P. (2011) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2011.579147 · Cited by 18
Choice with Endogenous Categorization
Ellis, A. W., & Masatlıoĝlu, Y. (2021) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdab011 · Cited by 21
Insurance Versus Moral Hazard in Income-Contingent Student Loan Repayment
de Silva, T. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf036 · Cited by 18
Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice
García‐Sanz, M. D., & Alcantud, J. C. R. (2015) · Mathematical Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.12.006 · Cited by 18
Boundedly rational backward induction
Ke, S. (2019) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te2402 · Cited by 18
Tempered best response dynamics
Zusai, D. (2017) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/s00182-017-0575-9 · Cited by 17
Warum denn eigentlich nicht? Zur Axiomatisierung soziologischer Handlungstheorie / Why Not? On Axiomatizing Sociological Action Theory
Tutić, A. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-2015-0203 · Cited by 17
A revealed preference analysis of solutions to simple allocation problems
Kıbrıs, Ö. (2011) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9273-4 · Cited by 17
On the Representation of Incomplete Preferences Over Risky Alternatives
Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2007) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9086-7 · Cited by 17
Context dependence and consistency in dynamic choice under uncertainty: the case of anticipated regret
Hayashi, T. (2009) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-009-9175-x · Cited by 17
(A,f): Choice With FramesPreprint
Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.982211 · Cited by 17
The prosociality of intuitive decisions depends on the status quo
Gärtner, M. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2018.04.005 · Cited by 16
Incomplete preferences and confidence
Hill, B. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.05.007 · Cited by 16
Buridanic competition
Bachi, B., & Ran Spiegler, Y. (2017) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.024 · Cited by 16

Authors: Masatlioglu, Y., & Ok, E. A.
Affiliations: New York University (US)
Corresponding author: Ok, Efe A.
ORCID: Ok, Efe A.
Venue: Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2005-03
Volume: 121
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-29
ISSN: 0022-0531 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.007
OpenAlex: W1970542860
Cited by: 343
References: 47
Citations by year: 2026: 7 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI: 6.51
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Economic Theory (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords: status quo bias, rational choice theory, revealed preference, endowment effect, choice behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Rational choice with status quo bias

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks