The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational choice with status quo bias
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The customer inertia originated from the Status Quo Bias (SQB) theoretical framework (Masatlioglu and Ok 2005; Samuelson and Zeckhauser 1988).”
From Health insurance policy renewal: an exploration of reputation, performance, and affect to understand customer inertia (2022) · cites this paper as Masatlioglu and Ok 2005
Citations
Cites
A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
Simon, H. A. (1955) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884852 · Cited by 15,877
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
The Handbook of experimental economics
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1645 · Cited by 3,780
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194
The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301753265543 · Cited by 3,119
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D. J., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009 · Cited by 2,870
Rabin, M. (1997) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,463
The Handbook of Experimental Economics
(2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvzsmff5 · Cited by 1,171
Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon
Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618031.006 · Cited by 1,156
Camerer, C. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvzsmff5.12 · Cited by 988
The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves
Knetsch, J. L. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475.010 · Cited by 880
Rational Choice Functions and Orderings
Arrow, K. J. (1959) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2550390 · Cited by 841
Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J. C., Meszaros, J. R., & Kunreuther, H. C. (1993) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf01065313 · Cited by 762
The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D. J., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2016) · Cited by 751
The Causes of Preference Reversal
Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. J. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618031.009 · Cited by 750
Framing, Probability Distortions, and Insurance Decisions
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J. C., Meszaros, J. R., & Kunreuther, H. C. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2192-7_3 · Cited by 670
Kreps, D. M. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429498619 · Cited by 579
Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking.
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0026468 · Cited by 571
Utility Theory without the Completeness Axiom
Aumann, R. J. (1962) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1909888 · Cited by 567
Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo
Hartman, R. S., Doane, M. J., & Woo, C. K. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937910 · Cited by 375
Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom
Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., & Ok, E. A. (2003) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/s0022-0531(03)00166-2 · Cited by 363
Self-citation"Preference Reversal" and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods
Karni, E., & Safra, Z. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913606 · Cited by 362
Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom
Holt, C. A. (1986) · American Economic Review · Cited by 350
Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon
Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (2001) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035352623.00025 · Cited by 333
Observing Violations of Transitivity by Experimental Methods
Loomes, G., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1991) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2938263 · Cited by 258
Utility Representation of an Incomplete Preference Relation
Ok, E. A. (2002) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2814 · Cited by 236
Self-citationIndependence of Irrelevant Alternatives
Ray, P. (1973) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913820 · Cited by 230
Smyth, B., & McGinty, L. (2003) · Cited by 171
Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice
Mandler, M. (2004) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.02.007 · Cited by 128
Does the Preference Reversal Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict the Independence Axiom
Segal, U. (1988) · American Economic Review · Cited by 127
Sagi, J. S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.01.009 · Cited by 101
Preference Reversals Without the Independence Axiom
Cox, J. C., & Epstein, S. (1989) · Digital Archive @ GSU · Cited by 83
Independence of irrelevant alternatives and revealed preferences
Peters, H. J. M. (1992) · Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8022-9_3 · Cited by 63
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Revealed Group Preferences
Peters, H. J. M., & Wakker, P. P. (1991) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2938291 · Cited by 53
Bossert, W., & Sprumont, Y. (2008) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00671.x · Cited by 22
Efficient and non-deteriorating choice
Bossert, W., & Sprumont, Y. (2003) · Mathematical Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-4896(03)00021-0 · Cited by 20
Revealed group preferences on non-convex choice problems
Ok, E. A., & Zhou, L. C. (1999) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s001990050275 · Cited by 13
Self-citationSagi, J. S. (2002) · Cited by 10
The dynamics and revealed preference of status-quo optimality
Vega‐Redondo, F. (1995) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/bf01212491 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences
Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133 · Cited by 2,728
Sequentially Rationalizable Choice
Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1824 · Cited by 378
Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2008) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00510.x · Cited by 297
Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing
Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2006) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdq016 · Cited by 291
Balakrishnan, J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., & Boy, F. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10203-y · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Masatlioglu, Y., & Ok, E. A.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ok, Efe A.
- ORCID
- Ok, Efe A.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Theory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0022-0531 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970542860
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Theory (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- status quo bias, rational choice theory, revealed preference, endowment effect, choice behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
