Cited by 22Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisGlass properties and applicationsBuilding materials and conservation

Chemical evolution of lead in ancient artifacts -A case study of early Chinese lead-silicate glaze

Yin, Xuesong, Huang, Tang Jiao, Gong, Hao·2020·Journal of the European Ceramic Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Yin, X., Huang, T. J., & Gong, H.
Affiliations
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Yin, Xuesong
  • Gong, Hao
Venue
Journal of the European Ceramic Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
2222-2228
ISSN
0955-2219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998272177
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the European Ceramic Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Building materials and conservation
Keywords
colorants, lead silicate glass, burial environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review