Cited by 286Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingMarket Dynamics and Volatility

Carry

Open access
Koijen, Ralph S.J., Moskowitz, Tobias J., Pedersen, Lasse Heje, Vrugt, Evert B.·2018·Journal of Financial Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.11.002

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transaction cost models of Bollerslev et al. (2018) and Koijen et al. (2018) are quite conservative.

    “Although the transaction cost models of Bollerslev et al. (2018) and Koijen et al. (2018) are quite conservative, we follow an even more cautious approach and deduct 57 bps from each portfolio's monthly excess returns.”

    From Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market (2021) · cites this paper as Koijen et al. (2018)

    Section 4.2 calls Koijen et al.'s transaction-cost estimate conservative for options because the quoted spreads likely overstate realistic costs. The Introduction describes its estimates for other asset classes as realistic, so the blanket characterization of its transaction-cost model as conservative is broader than the paper supports. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]21. Cochrane, J. H., 2011. Discount rates. Journal of Finance 66, 1047-1108.
  2. [42]42. Henriksson, R. D., Merton, R. C., 1981. On market timing and investment performance. The Journal of Business 54, 513-533.
  3. [46]46. Ilmanen, A., 2011. Expected Returns. John Wiley, United Kingdom.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koijen, R. S. J., Moskowitz, T. J., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrugt, E. B.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Koijen, Ralph S.J.
Venue
Journal of Financial Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
127
Issue
2
Pages
197-225
ISSN
0304-405X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4234492972
Cited by
286
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
30.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Financial Economics (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (338082, 312417)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
Keywords
carry, return predictability, asset pricing, uncovered interest parity, expectations hypothesis, risk premium, recession risk, liquidity risk, volatility risk, cross-section of returns, equity, bonds, commodities, options, credit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review