Cited by 490Stuttering Research and TreatmentVoice and Speech DisordersObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

The Impact of Stuttering on the Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter

Craig, Ashley, Blumgart, Elaine, Tran, Yvonne·2009·Journal of Fluency Disorders

Abstract

Unlabelled Stuttering is an involuntary fluency disorder that is not uncommon in society. However, the impact of stuttering on a composite measure such as quality of life has rarely been estimated. Quality of life (QOL) assesses the well-being of a person from a multidimensional perspective, and valid and reliable general QOL measures are available that can be used to estimate the impact of stuttering on QOL. This study involved the use of a general measure of QOL called the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) in order to assess the impact of stuttering in 200 adults who stutter (AWS). Comparisons to 200 adults of similar age and sex ratio who do not stutter were made so that the unique contribution of stuttering on QOL could be estimated. Findings indicated that stuttering does negatively impact QOL in the vitality, social functioning, emotional functioning and mental health status domains. Results also tentatively suggest that people who stutter with increased levels of severity may have a higher risk of poor emotional functioning. These findings have implications for treatment such as the necessity to address the emotional and psychological aspects of QOL in AWS and the need for additional clinical resources to be invested in stuttering treatment.Educational objectives The reader will be able to: (a) summarize the method used in quality of life assessment using the SF-36; (b) describe the impact of stuttering on the quality of life of adults who stutter; (c) compare the impact of stuttering to the quality of life of adults who do not stutter; (d) describe the relationship between frequency of stuttering and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 490

Authors
Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Craig, Ashley
Venue
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
61-71
ISSN
0094-730X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972163875
Cited by
490
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
21.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
stuttering, quality of life, adults who stutter, SF-36, vitality, social functioning, emotional functioning, mental health, stuttering severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Education, Continuing, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stuttering, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review