The Impact of Stuttering on the Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter
Abstract
Unlabelled Stuttering is an involuntary fluency disorder that is not uncommon in society. However, the impact of stuttering on a composite measure such as quality of life has rarely been estimated. Quality of life (QOL) assesses the well-being of a person from a multidimensional perspective, and valid and reliable general QOL measures are available that can be used to estimate the impact of stuttering on QOL. This study involved the use of a general measure of QOL called the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) in order to assess the impact of stuttering in 200 adults who stutter (AWS). Comparisons to 200 adults of similar age and sex ratio who do not stutter were made so that the unique contribution of stuttering on QOL could be estimated. Findings indicated that stuttering does negatively impact QOL in the vitality, social functioning, emotional functioning and mental health status domains. Results also tentatively suggest that people who stutter with increased levels of severity may have a higher risk of poor emotional functioning. These findings have implications for treatment such as the necessity to address the emotional and psychological aspects of QOL in AWS and the need for additional clinical resources to be invested in stuttering treatment.Educational objectives The reader will be able to: (a) summarize the method used in quality of life assessment using the SF-36; (b) describe the impact of stuttering on the quality of life of adults who stutter; (c) compare the impact of stuttering to the quality of life of adults who do not stutter; (d) describe the relationship between frequency of stuttering and quality of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have highlighted a number of particularly vulnerable areas for adults who stutter.
“Studies have highlighted a number of particularly vulnerable areas for AWS [2,51,52].”
From Inquiry based stress reduction (Ibsr) improves overall stuttering experience among adults who stutter: A randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 490
- Authors
- Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Craig, Ashley
- Venue
- Journal of Fluency Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-71
- ISSN
- 0094-730X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972163875
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- stuttering, quality of life, adults who stutter, SF-36, vitality, social functioning, emotional functioning, mental health, stuttering severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Education, Continuing, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stuttering, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review