CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersVoice and Speech Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language and motor abilities of preschool children who stutter: Evidence from behavioral and kinematic indices of nonword repetition performance

Open access
Smith, Anne, Goffman, Lisa, Sasisekaran, Jayanthi, Weber-Fox, Christine·2012·Journal of Fluency Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.06.001PMC PMC3614071
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled Stuttering is a disorder of speech production that typically arises in the preschool years, and many accounts of its onset and development implicate language and motor processes as critical underlying factors. There have, however, been very few studies of speech motor control processes in preschool children who stutter. Hearing novel nonwords and reproducing them engages multiple neural networks, including those involved in phonological analysis and storage and speech motor programming and execution. We used this task to explore speech motor and language abilities of 31 children aged 4-5 years who were diagnosed as stuttering. We also used sensitive and specific standardized tests of speech and language abilities to determine which of the children who stutter had concomitant language and/or phonological disorders. Approximately half of our sample of stuttering children had language and/or phonological disorders. As previous investigations would suggest, the stuttering children with concomitant language or speech sound disorders produced significantly more errors on the nonword repetition task compared to typically developing children. In contrast, the children who were diagnosed as stuttering, but who had normal speech sound and language abilities, performed the nonword repetition task with equal accuracy compared to their normally fluent peers. Analyses of interarticulator motions during accurate and fluent productions of the nonwords revealed that the children who stutter (without concomitant disorders) showed higher variability in oral motor coordination indices. These results provide new evidence that preschool children diagnosed as stuttering lag their typically developing peers in maturation of speech motor control processes.Educational objectives The reader will be able to: (a) discuss why performance on nonword repetition tasks has been investigated in children who stutter; (b) discuss why children who stutter in the current study had a higher incidence of concomitant language deficits compared to several other studies; (c) describe how performance differed on a nonword repetition test between children who stutter who do and do not have concomitant speech or language deficits; (d) make a general statement about speech motor control for nonword production in children who stutter compared to controls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.06.001

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A., Goffman, L., Sasisekaran, J., & Weber-Fox, C.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Anne
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
344-358
ISSN
0094-730X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.06.001
PMC
PMC3614071
OpenAlex
W2046756373
Cited by
114
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC00559, R01DC000559, R01DC004826)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
childhood stuttering, preschool children, non-word repetition, speech motor control, oral motor coordination, phonological disorders, speech sound disorders, speech fluency, movement variability
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language, Language Disorders, Language Tests, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Stuttering, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review