The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This work studies the advantageous features of the fluid inerter device for optimised structural control of buildings. Experimental data are first presented to characterise the fluid inerter dynamics, and validate the simplified analytical formulations. Building on these observations, the device is modelled as an inerter in parallel with a nonlinear dashpot representing a power law damping term. The latter dissipative effects are mainly induced by the pressure drops occurring in helical channels due to the fluid viscosity and density. Then, novel passive vibration control schemes are implemented for the earthquake protection of base-isolated buildings by combining the fluid inerter with a tuned mass damper system. To account for the uncertain nature of the earthquake input, the base acceleration is modelled as a Kanai–Tajimi filtered stationary random process. The optimal fluid inerter parameters, namely inertance and damping, are identified numerically by minimising stochastic performance indices relevant to displacement, acceleration, and energy-based measures of the structural response. The nonlinear damping behaviour of the fluid inerter is fully incorporated in the optimal design procedure via the statistical linearisation technique. Nonlinear response history analysis under an ensemble of 44 natural earthquake ground motions is carried out to assess the seismic performance of the system. Since inertance and damping are coupled characteristics in a real fluid inerter, design guidelines are finally outlined to determine the actual geometrical and mechanical properties of the device to achieve targeted parameters resulting from the optimisation procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter
Smith, M. C. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2002.803532 · Cited by 1,828
Marian, L., & Giaralis, A. (2014) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007 · Cited by 828
Gonzalez-Buelga, A., Lazar, I. F., Jiang, J. Z., Neild, S. A., & Inman, D. J. (2017) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.1879 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Inerter-based structural vibration control: A state-of-the-art review
Ma, R., Bi, K., & Hao, H. (2021) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112655 · Cited by 445
Dai, J., Xu, Z.-D., & Gai, P.-P. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109585 · Cited by 163
Tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) for suppressing edgewise vibrations of wind turbine blades
Zhang, Z., & Fitzgerald, B. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110928 · Cited by 132
Tuned mass damper inerter for seismic control of multi-story buildings: Ten years since inception
Konar, T., & Ghosh, A. (. (2024) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106459 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- De Domenico, D., Deastra, P., Ricciardi, G., Sims, N. D., & Wagg, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Franklin Institute
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7626-7649
- ISSN
- 0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901622730
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.11.012
- The paper
- De Domenico, D., Deastra, P., Ricciardi, G., Sims, N. D., & Wagg, D. J. (2019). Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings. Journal of the Franklin Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.11.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.