Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings

Open access
De Domenico, Dario, Deastra, Predaricka, Ricciardi, Giuseppe, Sims, Neil D., Wagg, David J.·2019·Journal of the Franklin Institute

Abstract

Abstract This work studies the advantageous features of the fluid inerter device for optimised structural control of buildings. Experimental data are first presented to characterise the fluid inerter dynamics, and validate the simplified analytical formulations. Building on these observations, the device is modelled as an inerter in parallel with a nonlinear dashpot representing a power law damping term. The latter dissipative effects are mainly induced by the pressure drops occurring in helical channels due to the fluid viscosity and density. Then, novel passive vibration control schemes are implemented for the earthquake protection of base-isolated buildings by combining the fluid inerter with a tuned mass damper system. To account for the uncertain nature of the earthquake input, the base acceleration is modelled as a Kanai–Tajimi filtered stationary random process. The optimal fluid inerter parameters, namely inertance and damping, are identified numerically by minimising stochastic performance indices relevant to displacement, acceleration, and energy-based measures of the structural response. The nonlinear damping behaviour of the fluid inerter is fully incorporated in the optimal design procedure via the statistical linearisation technique. Nonlinear response history analysis under an ensemble of 44 natural earthquake ground motions is carried out to assess the seismic performance of the system. Since inertance and damping are coupled characteristics in a real fluid inerter, design guidelines are finally outlined to determine the actual geometrical and mechanical properties of the device to achieve targeted parameters resulting from the optimisation procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.11.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
De Domenico, D., Deastra, P., Ricciardi, G., Sims, N. D., & Wagg, D. J.
Venue
Journal of the Franklin Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
356
Issue
14
Pages
7626-7649
ISSN
0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901622730
Cited by
203
References
3
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.11.012
The paper
De Domenico, D., Deastra, P., Ricciardi, G., Sims, N. D., & Wagg, D. J. (2019). Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings. Journal of the Franklin Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.11.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.