Cited by 66Nosocomial Infections in ICUOral microbiology and periodontitis researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Prospective, randomised, controlled study evaluating early modification of oral microbiota following admission to the intensive care unit and oral hygiene with chlorhexidine.

Tuon, Felipe Francisco, Gavrilko, Oleg, Almeida, Saulo de, Sumi, Eigi Ricardo, Alberto, Thiago, Rocha, Jaime Luis, Rosa, Edvaldo Antonio·2017·Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance

Abstract

Objectives Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most commonly used oral hygiene product for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). The change in dental plaque (DP) microbiota following CHX use in patients under MV has not been described previously. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pathogenic bacteria associated with VAP and the coverage of DP within the oral cavity in patients administered CHX.Methods This was a prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blind study in patients (n=16) under MV who were mouth-rinsed with either CHX or placebo. Microbiology samples were collected from the oral mucosa (OM) and DP after admission to the ICU and on Days 3, 5, 7 and 10. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CHX were determined.Results Upon admission, the occurrence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, was reported. The CHX group had a lower incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with the placebo group for the OM (RR=0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.98; P=0.011). There was high agreement between the culture results of OM and DP (κ=0.825). VAP developed in six patients. The species identified following tracheal aspiration of VAP patients were similar to those found in the OM for four cases. The strains showed low MICs and MBCs for CHX (<0.039mg/mL).Conclusions Although DP is rapidly colonised by MDR bacteria, use of 2% CHX reduced the incidence of S. aureus colonisation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.12.007

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improving oral hygiene care can reduce the risk and mortality risk of aspiration pneumonia by as much as 60%.

    “Several studies have reported that improving oral hygiene care by either mechanical or chemical control of dental plaque biofilm formation can reduce the number of potential respiratory pathogens and consequently the risk and mortality risk of aspiration pneumonia by as much as 60% (Dennesen et al., 2003; Tuon et al., 2017).”

    From Oral Microbiome and SARS-CoV-2: Beware of Lung Co-infection (2020) · cites this paper as Tuon et al., 2017

  • Improving oral hygiene care by either mechanical or chemical control of dental plaque biofilm formation can reduce the number of potential respiratory pathogens.

    “Several studies have reported that improving oral hygiene care by either mechanical or chemical control of dental plaque biofilm formation can reduce the number of potential respiratory pathogens and consequently the risk and mortality risk of aspiration pneumonia by as much as 60% (Dennesen et al., 2003; Tuon et al., 2017).”

    From Oral Microbiome and SARS-CoV-2: Beware of Lung Co-infection (2020) · cites this paper as Tuon et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuon, F. F., Gavrilko, O., Almeida, S. D., Sumi, E. R., Alberto, T., Rocha, J. L., & Rosa, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
  • Hospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba (BR)
Corresponding author
Tuon, Felipe Francisco
Venue
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
8
Pages
159-163
ISSN
2213-7165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590898695
Cited by
66
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
chlorhexidine, oral hygiene, ventilator-associated pneumonia, mechanical ventilation, dental plaque microbiota, oral microbiota, intensive care unit admission, multidrug-resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA colonization, antimicrobial susceptibility, minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum bactericidal concentration, tracheal aspiration
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Bacteria, Chlorhexidine, Dental Plaque, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Mouth Mucosa, Oral Hygiene, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Microbial Viability, Young Adult, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review