Maternal Genetic History of Southern East Asians over the Past 12,000 Years
Abstract
Southern East Asia, including Guangxi and Fujian provinces in China, is home to diverse ethnic groups, languages, and cultures. Previous studies suggest a high complexity regarding population dynamics and the history of southern East Asians. However, large-scale genetic studies on ancient populations in this region are hindered by limited sample preservation. Here, using highly efficient DNA capture techniques, we obtain 48 complete mitochondrial genomes of individuals from Guangxi and Fujian in China and reconstruct their maternal genetic history over the past 12,000 years. We find a strong connection between southern East Asians dating to ~12,000-6000 years ago and present-day Southeast Asians. In addition, stronger genetic affinities to northern East Asians are observed in historical southern East Asians than Neolithic southern East Asians, suggesting increased interactions between northern and southern East Asians over time. Overall, we reveal dynamic connections between ancient southern East Asians and populations located in surrounding regions, as well as a shift in maternal genetic structure within the populations over time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Populations from Guangxi and Fujian in southern East Asia reached Southeast Asia about 4000 years ago.
“Populations from Guangxi and Fujian in southern East Asia reached Southeast Asia about 4000 years ago [64].”
From The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Wang, T., Wu, X., Fan, X., Wang, W., Xie, G., Li, Z., Yang, Q., Cao, P., Yang, R., Liu, F., Dai, Q., Feng, X., Ping, W., Miao, B., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., & Fu, Q.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Shandong University (CN)
- Guangxi Normal University (CN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yichen
- Fu, Qiaomei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Genetics and Genomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 899-907
- ISSN
- 1873-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1673-8527
- OpenAlex
- W3173544731
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Tencent
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41630102, 41672021, 41925009)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-DQC003, XDA1905010, XDB26000000)
- Zhengzhou University (XKZDJC202006)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Keywords
- Guangxi, Fujian, population structure, Neolithic populations, population dynamics, ancient DNA
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Ancient, Maternal Inheritance, China, DNA, Mitochondrial, Asia, Eastern, Female, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Humans, Asian People, History, Ancient, Genome, Mitochondrial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review