Cited by 10Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMarine and coastal ecosystemsSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Nutrient footprints on the Toronto-Mississauga waterfront of Lake Ontario

Open access
Howell, E.T., Benoit, N.·2021·Journal of Great Lakes Research

Abstract

The extent of nutrient enrichment over the urbanized shoreline of western Lake Ontario bordering the Cities of Toronto and Mississauga was investigated in 2018. Concentrations of total phosphorus were higher and more wide-ranging compared with nearshore reference areas in eastern Lake Ontario. Area-weighted chlorophyll a was higher over the shoreline from the mouth of the Credit River to Humber Bay west of Toronto Harbour compared with that to the east from the Toronto Beaches to the Rouge River, a pattern also seen broadly in concentrations of phosphorus fractions and nitrates. Concentrations of phosphate measured by mass spectrometry, and using an internal standard to minimize sampling losses, were higher in Toronto Inner Harbour, near wastewater outfalls, river mouths, and to varying extent over the mixing areas of these discharges. Chlorophyll a suggested broadly oligotrophic to oligo-mesotrophic conditions despite areas with nutrient fractions suggestive of more productive conditions. Toronto Inner Harbour was mesotrophic, with wide-ranging levels of phosphorus fractions strongly influenced by the variable loading from the Don River into the harbour. Phosphorus fractions in the harbour quays which also receive CSOs discharges were elevated at times. Blooms or scums of planktonic algae were not observed. Elevated concentrations of phosphate were found at shallow depths suitable for growth of the green algae Cladophora. As these urban areas continue to grow, the potential for additional nutrient loading to exacerbate growth of algae should be watched given the present conditions that indicate variable but pervasive nutrient enrichment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.11.009

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a wastewater treatment plant upstream that empties into Humber Bay.

    “There is also a wastewater treatment plant upstream that empties into Humber Bay.39,40”

    From Microplastics and Anthropogenic Particles in Recreationally Caught Freshwater Fish from an Urbanized Region of the North American Great Lakes (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The “Phosphate and nitrate gradients near WWTP outfalls” section reports that effluent from the Humber WWTP affects Humber Bay, supporting the claim that a wastewater treatment plant discharges there. The paper does not establish that the plant is upstream of the location meant by the citing sentence; the “Study area” section distinguishes plants discharging directly to the lake from a plant upstream on the Don River. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Credit Valley Conservation (CVC), 2018. Lake Ontario Integrated Shoreline Strategy Characterization Report. December 2018. Pp. 310.
  2. Rukavina, N.A., 1969. Nearshore sediment survey of western Lake Ontario, methods and preliminary results. In: Proc. 12th Conf Great Lakes Res., lnternat. Assoc. Great Lakes Research. p. 317-324.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howell, E. T., & Benoit, N.
Affiliations
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (CA)
Corresponding author
Howell, E.T.
Venue
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
343-365
ISSN
0380-1330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110827297
Cited by
10
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Great Lakes Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
nutrient enrichment, Lake Ontario, phosphorus fractions, phosphate, chlorophyll a, nitrate, Toronto Harbour, Mississauga, Don River, combined sewer overflows, sewage outfalls, Cladophora, algal blooms, eutrophication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review