The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study trends in the main indicators of health, medical practices and risk factors in France. POPULATION AND METHOD: We collected data from samples of all births in France during one week in 1995 (n=13318), 1998 (n=13718), 2003 (n=14737) and 2010 (n=14903) and have compared them. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2010, maternal age and body mass index increased steadily, but tobacco use decreased. In 2010, 39.4% of pregnant women had a visit with a midwife in a maternity unit, versus 26.6% in 2003. Deliveries occurred in large public hospitals more and more frequently. The increase in caesarean sections was no longer significant between 2003 and 2010. In general, medical decisions during pregnancy and delivery were closer to professional recommendations in 2010 than in earlier years. Live births before 37 weeks increased steadily from 5.4% in 1995 to 6.6% in 2010, but the proportion of birth weights below 2500g or the 10th percentile stopped increasing after 2003. CONCLUSION: Routine national perinatal surveys highlight major trends in maternal characteristics, obstetric practices, organisation of services, and perinatal health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Villar, J., Carroli, G., Zavaleta, N., Donner, A., Wojdyla, D., Faundes, A., Velazco, A., Bataglia, V., Langer, A., Narváez, A., et al. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55 · Cited by 694
Review article: Obesity in pregnancy
Yu, C., Teoh, T., & Robinson, S. (2006) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00991.x · Cited by 494
La santé périnatale en France métropolitaine de 1995 à 2003
Blondel, B., Supernant, K., du Mazaubrun, C., & Bréart, G. (2006) · Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément/Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction · doi:10.1016/s0368-2315(06)76409-2 · Cited by 259
Self-citationInterobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score
O’Donnell, C. P. F., Kamlin, C. O. F., Davis, P. G., Carlin, J. B., & Morley, C. J. (2006) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.05.040 · Cited by 189
Is a Rising Cesarean Delivery Rate Inevitable? Trends in Industrialized Countries, 1987 to 2007
Declercq, E., Young, R., Cabral, H., & Ecker, J. (2011) · Birth · doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.2010.00459.x · Cited by 175
Coonrod, D. V., Drachman, D., Hobson, P., & Manriquez, M. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.026 · Cited by 104
Lee, S., Steer, P., & Filippi, V. (2006) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01055.x · Cited by 92
Impact de l’âge maternel élevé sur la fertilité, la santé de la mère et la santé de l’enfant
Khoshnood, B., Bouvier‐Colle, M., Léridon, H., & Blondel, B. (2008) · Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément/Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.08.007 · Cited by 85
Self-citationChodick, G., Shalev, V., Goren, I., & Inskip, P. D. (2007) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.013 · Cited by 68
Level of Perinatal Care of the Maternity Unit and Rate of Cesarean in Low-Risk Nulliparas
Ray, C. L., Carayol, M., Zeitlin, J. A., Bréart, G., & Goffinet, F. (2006) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000218098.70942.a2 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Cited by
Blondel, B., Coulm, B., Bonnet, C., Goffinet, F., & Le Ray, C. (2017) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.002 · Cited by 389
Self-citationTen Years of Confidential Inquiries Into Maternal Deaths in France, 1998–2007
Saucedo, M., Deneux-Tharaux, C., & Bouvier-Colle, M.-H. (2013) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31829fc38c · Cited by 145
Épidémiologie et facteurs de risque de la prématurité
Torchin, H., & Ancel, P.-Y. (2016) · Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.013 · Cited by 134
Barry, Y., Bonaldi, C., Goulet, V., Coutant, R., Léger, J., Paty, A.-C., Delmas, D., Cheillan, D., & Roussey, M. (2016) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.11.005 · Cited by 86
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with colorectal endometriosis
Thomin, A., Belghiti, J., David, C., Marty, O., Bornes, M., Ballester, M., Roman, H., & Daraï, E. (2018) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14221 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Blondel, B., Lelong, N., Kermarrec, M., & Goffinet, F.
- Venue
- Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1-e15
- ISSN
- 0150-9918 (ISSN-L)
- 0368-2315
- OpenAlex
- W2051341869
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 44.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.04.014
- The paper
- Blondel, B., Lelong, N., Kermarrec, M., & Goffinet, F. (2012). Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.04.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
