Cited by 145Maternal and fetal healthcareGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Ten Years of Confidential Inquiries Into Maternal Deaths in France, 1998–2007

Saucedo, Monica, Deneux-Tharaux, Catherine, Bouvier-Colle, Marie-Hélène·2013·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the maternal mortality ratio over a 10-year period in France and the causes, risk factors, quality of care, and avoidability of maternal deaths. METHODS: Maternal deaths up to 1 year after the end of the pregnancy from 1998 to 2007 were identified and studied through the French Confidential Enquiry Into Maternal Deaths system. Time trends were analyzed by comparing the two 5-year periods for maternal mortality ratios, both overall and by women's characteristics, causes of death, existence of suboptimal care, and avoidability. RESULTS: For the 10-year period, 660 maternal deaths were identified. The maternal mortality ratio was similar in the two 5-year periods, 8.8 per 100,000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-9.8) for 1998-2002 and 8.4 per 100,000 live births (95% CI 7.6-9.4) for 2003-2007. The distributions of maternal age, nationality, and of causes of death did not change. Overall, hemorrhage was the leading cause of death, responsible for 18% of maternal deaths, followed by amniotic fluid embolism, thromboembolism, hypertensive disorders, and cardiovascular conditions, each of which contributed to 10-12% of deaths. Suboptimal care decreased from 70% in 1998-2002 to 60% in 2003-2007 (P<.03). Half of all deaths were considered avoidable and this proportion did not change. The most frequent contributory factor was inadequate management. CONCLUSION: The ratio and profile of maternal mortality in France remained unchanged from 1998 to 2007. Half of all maternal deaths are still considered avoidable, which indicates that improvement remains possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : III.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e31829fc38c

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saucedo, M., Deneux-Tharaux, C., & Bouvier-Colle, M.-H.
Affiliations
Institut de Veille Sanitaire (FR)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2013-10
Volume
122
Issue
4
Pages
752-760
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004323726
Cited by
145
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
FWCI
17.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
maternal mortality, maternal mortality ratio, causes of maternal death, hemorrhage, amniotic fluid embolism, thromboembolism, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cardiovascular complications, avoidable maternal deaths, suboptimal care, maternity care quality, temporal trends, France
MeSH terms
Adult, Cause of Death, Female, France, Humans, Maternal Mortality, Pregnancy, Quality of Health Care, Risk Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review