Sorption of acid red 57 from aqueous solution onto sepiolite

Alkan, Mahir, Demirbaş, Özkan, Çelikçapa, Sermet, Doğan, Mehmet·2004·Journal of Hazardous Materials

DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.003

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review
CRINI, G. (2006) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001 · Cited by 4,508
Equilibrium sorption of anionic dye from aqueous solution by palm kernel fibre as sorbent
OFOMAJA, A., & HO, Y. (2007) · Dyes and Pigments · doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.014 · Cited by 273
Potentiality of banana peel for removal of Congo red dye from aqueous solution: isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamics studies
Mondal, N. K., & Kar, S. (2018) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-018-0811-x · Cited by 180
Nanoadsorbents for wastewater treatment: next generation biotechnological solution
Ali, M. E., Hoque, M. E., Safdar Hossain, S. K., & Biswas, M. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02755-4 · Cited by 120

Authors: Alkan, M., Demirbaş, Ö., Çelikçapa, S., & Doğan, M.
Venue: Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2004-12
Volume: 116
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 135-145
ISSN: 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.003
OpenAlex: W2088553638
Cited by: 293
References: 0
FWCI: 11.73
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review