The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrochemical coagulation for textile effluent decolorization
Abstract
The three most commonly used dyestuffs in textile industry are reactive, acid, and dispersed dyes. One dye from each group, C.I. Reactive Blue-19, C.I. Acid Red-266, and C.I. Disperse Yellow-218 was chosen to study the feasibility of coagulation for color removal. The dyes used in these experiments were chosen to represent the two major structural features: anthraquinone and azo dyes. Reactive Blue is an anthraquinone-based dye, and Acid Red and Disperse Yellow represent azo-based dyes. As there is no standard method to measure the color intensity, a Hach spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance before and after the dye solution was treated. Removal efficiencies on these dyes were obtained by measuring absorbance of a sample at 592 nm for Reactive Blue, 498 nm for Acid Red, and 428 nm for Disperse Yellow. Aluminum and ferric coagulants were produced in a parallel-plate electrochemical reactor by anodic dissolution. Removal efficiencies of more than 98%, in terms of absorbance, were observed in laboratory conditions. Removal was found highly dependent upon NaCl concentration, applied voltage, current density, and pH. The NaCl in the solution effectively reduced the power consumption and promoted the coagulant generation by depasivating the Al-water and Fe-water electrochemical systems. The processes were determined to be highly NaCl dependent. A mechanism was proposed for the corresponding liquid phase chemistry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Electrochemical coagulation producing in-situ coagulants based on aluminium or iron, showed great dye removal potential (Reactive Blue 19 was used as a representative AQ dye, but other dyes were studied as well) and associated time 73 .”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, what was only acknowledged but not commented further is sludge production and the need to deal with it, but, it was shown qualitatively that use of different conditions can have an effect on the amount and type of produced sludge.”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Routoula, E., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03737 · Cited by 579
Textile Dyeing Effluents and Environment Concerns - A Review
Islam, M., & Mostafa, M. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources · doi:10.3329/jesnr.v11i1-2.43380 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- YANG, C., & MCGARRAHAN, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12-09
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 40-47
- ISSN
- 0304-3894
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review