The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of arsenic from water using granular ferric hydroxide: Macroscopic and microscopic studies
Abstract
Removal of arsenate from water using granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) was investigated under different pH and As(V) loading conditions, using batch equilibrium adsorption, FTIR, and EXAFS methods. The arsenate adsorption envelopes on GFH exhibited broad adsorption maxima when the initial As(V) concentration was less than 500 mg/L at sorbent concentration of 10 g/L. As the initial As(V) concentration increased to 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/L for the same sorbent concentration, distinct adsorption maxima appeared and shifted to lower pH. Acidimetric-alkalimetric titration and arsenic adsorption isotherm data indicated that the surface of GFH is high heterogeneous. FTIR spectra revealed that complexes of two different structures, bidentate and monodentate, were formed upon the adsorption of arsenate on GFH, and bidentate complexes were only observed at pH values greater than 6. The EXAFS analyses confirmed that arsenate form bidentate binuclear complexes with GFH at pH 7.4 as evidenced by an average Fe-As(V) bond distance of 3.32 A.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the major problems encountered on the field by aforesaid adsorption methods is the presence of high iron content in groundwater, which emanates into clogging of the filter material thereby reducing the lifetime of the filter [178, 185].”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [178]
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Gupta, 2005, Adsorption of As(III) from aqueous solutions by iron oxide-coated sand, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 288, 55, 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.054 · DOI
- Pontius, 1994, Health implications of arsenic in drinking water, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 86, 52, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1994.tb06246.x · DOI
- Bissen, 2003, Arsenic—a review. Part II. Oxidation of arsenic and its removal in water treatment, Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 31, 97, 10.1002/aheh.200300485 · DOI
- Smedley, 2002, A review of the source, behavior, and distribution of arsenic in natural waters, Appl. Geochem., 17, 517, 10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferguson, 1972, A review of the arsenic cycle in nature waters, Water Res., 6, 1259, 10.1016/0043-1354(72)90052-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, 1991, Arsenic treatment considerations, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 91, 74, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1999.tb08601.x · DOI
- Driehaus, 1998, Granular ferric hydroxide—a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural ferric hydroxide, J. Water SRT-Aqua, 47, 30
- Hatch, 2002, Meeting the new arsenic standard with a new iron based adsorbent media: POU applications, Water Cond. Purif., 44, 52
- Halter, 2001, Arsenic(V) adsorption onto α-Al2O3 between 25 and 70°C, Appl. Geochem., 16, 793, 10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00066-4 · DOI
- Lin, 2001, Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: equilibrium and kinetics, Water Res., 35, 2049, 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00467-X · DOI · Paper page
- Goldberg, 2002, Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 413, 10.2136/sssaj2002.4130 · DOI
- Guo, 2005, Removal of arsenic by bead cellulose loaded with iron oxyhydroxide from groundwater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6808, 10.1021/es048080k · DOI
- Genç, 2003, Adsorption of arsenate from water using neutralized red mud, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 264, 327, 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00447-8 · DOI
- Waychunas, 1995, Geometry of sorbed arsenate on ferrihydrite and crystalline FeOOH—reevaluation of EXAFS results and topological factors in predicting sorbate geometry, and evidence for monodentate complexes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 59, 3655, 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00276-6 · DOI
- Waychunas, 1993, Surface-chemistry of ferrihydrite. 1. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochim, Cosmochim. Acta, 57, 2251, 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90567-G · DOI
- Hsia, 1994, Characterization of arsenate adsorption on hydrous iron-oxide using chemical and physical methods, Colloids Surf. A, 85, 1, 10.1016/0927-7757(94)02752-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Sun, 1996, An investigation of arsenate and arsenite bonding structures on goethite by FTIR, Soil Sci., 161, 865, 10.1097/00010694-199612000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
- Grossl, 1997, Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 2. Kinetic evaluation using a pressure-jump relaxation technique, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 321, 10.1021/es950654l · DOI
- Grossl, 1995, Evaluation for contaminant ion adsorption–desorption on goethite using pressure-jump relaxation kinetics, Geoderma, 67, 87, 10.1016/0016-7061(95)00023-H · DOI
- Jain, 1999, Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: surface charge reduction and net OH-release stoichiometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1179, 10.1021/es980722e · DOI
- Forstner, 1998, Geochemical demobilization of metallic pollutants in solid waste-implications for arsenic in waterworks sludges, J. Geochem. Explor., 62, 29, 10.1016/S0375-6742(97)00070-8 · DOI
- Nordstrom, 1999, Negative pH, efflorescent mineralogy, and consequences for environmental restoration at the iron mountain superfund site, California, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 3455, 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3455 · DOI
- Cross, 1990, Use of scattered radiation for absolute X-ray energy calibration, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 70, 38, 10.1063/1.1149539 · DOI
- Newville, 2001, IFEFFIT: interactive XAFS analysis and FEFF fitting, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 8, 322, 10.1107/S0909049500016964 · DOI
- Ravel, 2005, ATHENA, ARTEMIS HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 12, 537, 10.1107/S0909049505012719 · DOI
- Kitahama, 1975, Refinement of the crystal structure of scorodite, Acta Crystallogr. B, 31, 322, 10.1107/S056774087500266X · DOI
- Rau, 2003, Arsenic(V) adsorption by immobilized iron mediation modeling of the adsorption process and influence of interfering anions, React. Funct. Polym., 54, 85, 10.1016/S1381-5148(02)00184-0 · DOI
- Jia, 2006, Observation of surface precipitation of arsenate on ferrihydrite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3248, 10.1021/es051872+ · DOI
- Bang, 2005, Removal of arsenic from groundwater by granular titanium dioxide adsorbent, Chemosphere, 60, 389, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.008 · DOI
- Raven, 1998, Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 344, 10.1021/es970421p · DOI
- Myneni, 1998, Vibrational spectroscopy of functional group chemistry and arsenate coordination in ettringite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 62, 3499, 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00221-X · DOI
- Myneni, 1998, Experimental and theoretical vibrational spectroscopic evaluation of arsenate coordination in aqueous solutions, solids, and at mineral–water interfaces, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 62, 3285, 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00222-1 · DOI
- Tejedor-Tejedor, 1990, Protonation of phosphate on the surface of goethite as studied by CIR-FTIR and electrophoretic mobility, Langmuir, 6, 602, 10.1021/la00093a015 · DOI
- Gong, 2001, A real time in situ ATR-FTIR spectroscopic study of linear phosphate adsorption on titania surfaces, Int. J. Miner. Process, 63, 147, 10.1016/S0301-7516(01)00045-X · DOI
- Guan, 2005, Surface complexation of condensed phosphate to aluminum hydroxide: an ATR-FTIR spectroscopic investigation, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 289, 319, 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.041 · DOI
- Pena, 2006, Adsorption mechanism of arsenic on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 1257, 10.1021/es052040e · DOI
- Jing, 2005, Arsenic leachability in water treatment adsorbents, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 5481, 10.1021/es050290p · DOI
- Ladeira, 2001, Mechanism of anion retention from EXAFS and density functional calculations: arsenic(V) adsorbed on gibbsite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 1211, 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00581-0 · DOI
- Sherman, 2003, Surface complexation of arsenic(V) to iron(III) (hydr)oxides: structural mechanism from ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 67, 4223, 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00237-0 · DOI
- Beaulieu, 2005, Arsenate adsorption structures on aluminum oxide and phyllosilicate mineral surfaces in smelter-impacted soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 3571, 10.1021/es048836f · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616
“Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for the removal of As yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals [174, 180–184].”
BackgroundIron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water
Giles, D. E., Mohapatra, M., Issa, T. B., Anand, S., & Singh, P. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.018 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Guan, X.-H., Wang, J., & Chusuei, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Jianmin
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 178-185
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043927988
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- University of Delaware
- University of Missouri
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- arsenate removal, granular ferric hydroxide, adsorption isotherms, arsenic adsorption, pH effect, binuclear iron complexes, surface heterogeneity, water treatment, heavy metal removal
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Arsenic, Ferric Compounds, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review