The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: A review
Open accessAbstract
In aqueous systems, chromium usually exists in both trivalent and hexavalent oxidation states, being Cr(VI) of particular importance and concern due to its great toxicity. Industrial sources of Cr(VI) are leather tanning, mining of chrome ore, production of steel and alloys, etc. The most common conventional method for Cr(VI) removal is reduction to Cr(III) at pH 2.0 and precipitation of Cr (OH)(3) with lime at pH 9-10. The disadvantage of precipitation is the disposal of the solid waste. Adsorption of Cr by different low cost materials seems to be a suitable choice for wastewater treatment. Many by-products of agriculture have proved to be suitable low cost adsorbents for Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from water. Lignocellulosic residues, which include both wood residues and agricultural residues, have adsorption capacity comparable to other natural sorbents, but they have the advantage of very low or no cost, great availability and simple operational process. This study is a review of the recent literature on the use of natural and modified lignocellulosic residues for Cr adsorption. The Cr maximum adsorption capacity and the adsorption mechanism under different experimental conditions are reported when possibly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review
Babel, S. (2003) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00263-7 · Cited by 3,444
Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste materials: a review
Demirbas, A. (2008) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.024 · Cited by 1,566
Cited by
Rana, A. K., Scarpa, F., & Thakur, V. K. (2022) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115356 · Cited by 134
Valorisation of post-sorption materials: Opportunities, strategies, and challenges
Harikishore Kumar Reddy, D., Vijayaraghavan, K., Kim, J. A., & Yun, Y.-S. (2017) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2016.12.002 · Cited by 127
Use of Surfactant-Modified Zeolites and Clays for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Water
Jiménez-Castañeda, M., & Medina, D. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9040235 · Cited by 122
Feng, Z.-Q., Yuan, X., & Wang, T. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123730 · Cited by 113
Xing, X., Alharbi, N. S., Ren, X., & Chen, C. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107325 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Miretzky, P., & Cirelli, A. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08-15
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125672123
- Cited by
- 949
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.060
- The paper
- Miretzky, P., & Cirelli, A. F. (2010). Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.