Determination of lead in environmental waters with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction prior to atomic fluorescence spectrometry
Abstract
This paper established a new, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of lead in water samples preconcentrated by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) prior to atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Dithizone was used as the chelating agent. In the DLLME procedure, lead formed lead-dithizone complex and migrated into the carbon tetrachloride micro-droplets. Important factors that would affect the extraction efficiency had been investigated including the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, sample pH, the amount of chelating agent, extraction time and centrifugation time. The results showed that the coexisting ions containing in water samples had no obvious negative effect on the determination of lead. The experimental results indicated that the proposed method had a good linear range of 0.01-100 ng mL(-1) (r(2) = 0.9990). The precision was 2.12% (RSD, n = 7) and the detection limit was 0.95 ng L(-1). Proposed method was validated with four real environmental samples and the results indicated that the proposed method was excellent for the future use and satisfied spiked recoveries were in the range of 92.9-97.4%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LOD of 0.008 μg L−1 for the developed DES-ME was between those of other microextraction methods.
“The limits of detection of 0.008 µg L−1 for the developed DES-ME were between those of the other methods, as shown in Table 5.”
From Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Microextraction of Lead(II) Traces from Water and Aqueous Extracts before FAAS Measurements (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Zhou, Q., Zhao, N., & Xie, G.
- Affiliations
- China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
- Henan Institute of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Qingxiang
- ORCID
- Zhou, Qingxiang
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 48-53
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973611943
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Henan University
- Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
- Keywords
- lead determination, environmental water, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, atomic fluorescence spectrometry, dithizone, preconcentration, extraction efficiency optimization, coexisting ions interference
- MeSH terms
- Chemical Fractionation, Lead, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Reproducibility of Results, Limit of Detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review