Cited by 138Analytical chemistry methods developmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesElectrochemical Analysis and Applications

Determination of lead in environmental waters with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction prior to atomic fluorescence spectrometry

Zhou, Qingxiang, Zhao, Na, Xie, Guohong·2011·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

This paper established a new, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of lead in water samples preconcentrated by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) prior to atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Dithizone was used as the chelating agent. In the DLLME procedure, lead formed lead-dithizone complex and migrated into the carbon tetrachloride micro-droplets. Important factors that would affect the extraction efficiency had been investigated including the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, sample pH, the amount of chelating agent, extraction time and centrifugation time. The results showed that the coexisting ions containing in water samples had no obvious negative effect on the determination of lead. The experimental results indicated that the proposed method had a good linear range of 0.01-100 ng mL(-1) (r(2) = 0.9990). The precision was 2.12% (RSD, n = 7) and the detection limit was 0.95 ng L(-1). Proposed method was validated with four real environmental samples and the results indicated that the proposed method was excellent for the future use and satisfied spiked recoveries were in the range of 92.9-97.4%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.123

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 138

Authors
Zhou, Q., Zhao, N., & Xie, G.
Affiliations
  • China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
  • Henan Institute of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Qingxiang
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
189
Issue
1-2
Pages
48-53
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973611943
Cited by
138
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Henan University
  • Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Keywords
lead determination, environmental water, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, atomic fluorescence spectrometry, dithizone, preconcentration, extraction efficiency optimization, coexisting ions interference
MeSH terms
Chemical Fractionation, Lead, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Reproducibility of Results, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review