Cited by 127Arsenic contamination and mitigationAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Sorption of arsenite and arsenate on ferrihydrite: Effect of organic and inorganic ligands

Zhu, Jun, Pigna, Massimo, Cozzolino, Vincenza, Caporale, Antonio G., Violante, Antonio·2011·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

We studied the sorption of As(III) and As(V) onto ferrihydrite as affected by pH, nature and concentration of organic [oxalic (OX), malic (MAL), tartaric (TAR), and citric (CIT) acid] and inorganic [phosphate (PO(4)), sulphate (SO(4)), selenate (SeO(4)) and selenite (SeO(3))] ligands, and the sequence of anion addition. The sorption capacity of As(III) was greater than that of As(V) in the range of pH 4.0-11.0. The capability of organic and inorganic ligands in preventing As sorption follows the sequence: SeO(4) ≈ SO(4) < OX < MAL ≈ TAR < CIT < SeO(3) ≪ PO(4). The efficiency of most of the competing ligands in preventing As(III) and As(V) sorption increased by decreasing pH, but PO(4) whose efficiency increased by increasing pH. In acidic systems all the competing ligands inhibited the sorption of As(III) more than As(V), but in alkaline environments As(III) and As(V) seem to be retained with the same strength on the Fe-oxide. Finally, the competing anions prevented As(III) and As(V) sorption more when added before than together or after As(III) or As(V).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.071

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In acidic environments, all the ligands prevented the sorption of arsenite on ferrihydrite more than that of arsenate, but in alkaline systems, arsenite and arsenate seemed to be retained with the same strength.

    “In acidic environments, all the ligands prevented the sorption of arsenite on ferrihydrite more than that of arsenate, but in alkaline systems, arsenite and arsenate seemed to be retained with the same strength.”
  • The efficiency of most of the competing anions in preventing the sorption of the metalloids decreased by increasing the pH.

    “The efficiency of most of the competing anions in preventing the sorption of the metalloids decreased by increasing the pH.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, J., Pigna, M., Cozzolino, V., Caporale, A. G., & Violante, A.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Violante, Antonio
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
189
Issue
1-2
Pages
564-571
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011363200
Cited by
127
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
arsenate adsorption, ferrihydrite, organic ligands, inorganic ligands, phosphate, sulfate, selenate, selenite, oxalic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, pH effect, iron oxide adsorption, arsenic speciation
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenates, Ferric Compounds, Inorganic Chemicals, Ligands, Organic Chemicals, Arsenites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review