Influence of impregnation method on metal retention of CCB-treated wood in slow pyrolysis process
Open accessAbstract
In the present work, the effects of copper, chromium and boron on the pyrolysis of wood and their distribution in the pyrolysis products were investigated. For this, the wood has been impregnated with chromium-copper-boron (CCB). In addition, to describe the effects of impregnation method, vacuum-pressure and dipping methods were also conducted. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results show that an increase in the final residue and decrease in degradation temperature on both methods of treated wood compared to untreated wood. Then, slow pyrolysis experiments were carried out in a laboratory reactor. The mass balance of pyrolysis products is confirmed by TGA. Furthermore, the concentration of metals in the final residue is measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). The results show that the final residue contains more than 45% of the initial amount of metal present in the treated wood. The phenomenon is more pronounced with vacuum-pressure treated wood. The heating values of pyrolysis products were analyzed. The heating value of charcoal obtained from treated and untreated wood is approximately same. But the heating value of tar from untreated wood is higher than the heating value of the tar from treated wood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inorganic salts act as catalysts in pyrolysis reactions, which leads to increased biochar yield.
“Indeed, inorganic salts act as catalysts in pyrolysis reactions, which leads to increased biochar yield [16,17,28,39,40].”
From Pyrolysis of Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Wood: Investigation of Temperature, Granulometry, Biochar Yield, and Metal Pathways (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Helsen, L., & Van den Bulck, E. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.025 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gmar, M., Bouafif, H., Bouslimi, B., Braghiroli, F. L., & Koubaa, A. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15145071 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kinata, S. E., Loubar, K., Bouslamti, A., Belloncle, C., & Tazerout, M.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire de Génie des Procédés – Environnement – Agro-alimentaire (FR)
- Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Kinata, Silao Espérance
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 233-234
- Pages
- 172-176
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054751142
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
- Keywords
- wood pyrolysis, slow pyrolysis, metal retention, vacuum pressure impregnation, pyrolysis residue, pyrolysis products, calorific value, tar, copper, chromium, boron
- MeSH terms
- Boron, Charcoal, Chromium, Copper, Hot Temperature, Pressure, Thermogravimetry, Wood, Incineration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review