Advantages of low pH and limited oxygenation in arsenite removal from water by zero-valent iron
Abstract
The removal of toxic arsenic species from contaminated waters by zero-valent iron (ZVI) has drawn considerable attention in recent years. In this approach, arsenic ions are mainly removed by adsorption to the iron corrosion products. Reduction to zero-valent arsenic on the ZVI surface is possible in the absence of competing oxidants and can reduce arsenic mobility and sludge formation. However, associated removal rates are relatively low. In the current study, simultaneous high reduction and removal rates of arsenite (H3AsO3), the more toxic and mobile environmentally occurring arsenic species, was demonstrated by reacting it with ZVI under limited aeration and relatively low pH. 90% of the removed arsenic was attached to the ZVI particles and 60% of which was in the elemental state. Under the same non-acidic conditions, only 40-60% of the removed arsenic was attached to the ZVI with no change in arsenic oxidation state. Under anaerobic conditions, reduction occurred but total arsenic removal rate was significantly lower and ZVI demand was higher. The effective arsenite removal under acidic oxygen-limited conditions was explained by formation of Fe(II)-solid intermediate on the ZVI surface that provided high surface area and reducing power.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for removal of arsenic, yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals.
“Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for the removal of As yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals [174, 180–184].”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [181]
Cites
Appraisal of a simple arsenic removal method for ground water of Bangladesh
Khan, A. H., Rasul, S. B., Munir, A. K. M., Habibuddowla, M., Alauddin, M., Newaz, S. S., & Hussam, A. (2000) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/10934520009377018 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
“In the last decade, removal of As using zero valent iron (ZVI) or Fe(0) for removal of As has been widely explored by several research groups both in the laboratory [142, 186, 187] and in the field [188–192].”
Background
- Authors
- Klas, S., & Kirk, D. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Klas, Sivan
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 252-253
- Pages
- 77-82
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012451844
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Keywords
- arsenite removal, zero-valent iron, low pH, arsenic reduction, iron corrosion products, elemental arsenic, anaerobic conditions, water treatment, arsenic adsorption
- MeSH terms
- Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Iron, Oxygen, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Arsenites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review