Cited by 64Environmental remediation with nanomaterialsArsenic contamination and mitigationAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Advantages of low pH and limited oxygenation in arsenite removal from water by zero-valent iron

Klas, Sivan, Kirk, Donald W.·2013·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

The removal of toxic arsenic species from contaminated waters by zero-valent iron (ZVI) has drawn considerable attention in recent years. In this approach, arsenic ions are mainly removed by adsorption to the iron corrosion products. Reduction to zero-valent arsenic on the ZVI surface is possible in the absence of competing oxidants and can reduce arsenic mobility and sludge formation. However, associated removal rates are relatively low. In the current study, simultaneous high reduction and removal rates of arsenite (H3AsO3), the more toxic and mobile environmentally occurring arsenic species, was demonstrated by reacting it with ZVI under limited aeration and relatively low pH. 90% of the removed arsenic was attached to the ZVI particles and 60% of which was in the elemental state. Under the same non-acidic conditions, only 40-60% of the removed arsenic was attached to the ZVI with no change in arsenic oxidation state. Under anaerobic conditions, reduction occurred but total arsenic removal rate was significantly lower and ZVI demand was higher. The effective arsenite removal under acidic oxygen-limited conditions was explained by formation of Fe(II)-solid intermediate on the ZVI surface that provided high surface area and reducing power.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.02.044

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for removal of arsenic, yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals.

    “Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for the removal of As yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals [174, 180–184].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klas, S., & Kirk, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Klas, Sivan
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
252-253
Pages
77-82
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012451844
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
arsenite removal, zero-valent iron, low pH, arsenic reduction, iron corrosion products, elemental arsenic, anaerobic conditions, water treatment, arsenic adsorption
MeSH terms
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Iron, Oxygen, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Arsenites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review