The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
Jensen, F. V., & Nielsen, T. D. (2007) · Information Science and Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2 · Cited by 4,129
Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems
(1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-27609-4 · Cited by 3,321
Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control
Lees, F. P. (1996) · Cited by 766
Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches
Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2011) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012 · Cited by 765
Self-citationBayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
Ahmed, S. E. (2008) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2008.s543 · Cited by 719
Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network
Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2013) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005 · Cited by 603
Self-citationBayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis
Kjærulff, U. B., & Madsen, A. L. (2013) · Information Science and Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5104-4 · Cited by 599
Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach
Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003 · Cited by 373
Self-citationRisk Analysis in Engineering and Economics
Ayyub, B. M., & Ayyub, B. M. (2003) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203497692 · Cited by 313
Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory
Kalantarnia, M., Khan, F. I., & Hawboldt, K. (2009) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.04.006 · Cited by 271
Cited by
Moradi, R., & Groth, K. M. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.041 · Cited by 1,390
Zio, E. (2018) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.020 · Cited by 401
Fault Tree Analysis Improvements: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review
Yazdi, M., Mohammadpour, J., Li, H., Huang, H., Zarei, E., Pirbalouti, R. G., & Adumene, S. (2023) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.3271 · Cited by 199
Self-citationMarvin, H. J. P., Bouzembrak, Y., Janssen, E. M., van der Zande, M., Murphy, F., Sheehan, B., Mullins, M., & Bouwmeester, H. (2017) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.1080/17435390.2016.1278481 · Cited by 82
Hassan, S., Wang, J., Kontovas, C., & Bashir, M. (2022) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104616 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Zarei, E., Azadeh, A., Khakzad, N., Aliabadi, M. M., & Mohammadfam, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 321
- Pages
- 830-840
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2529702177
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074
- The paper
- Zarei, E., Azadeh, A., Khakzad, N., Aliabadi, M. M., & Mohammadfam, I. (2017). Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
