The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium recovery from effluent of spent lithium battery recycling process using solvent extraction
Abstract
A novel process of lithium recovery from effluent of spent lithium batteries recycling by solvent extraction was proposed. The β-diketone extraction system used in the experiment was composed of benzoyltrifluoroacetone (HBTA), trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) and kerosene. The effective parameters such as solution pH value, saponification degree, initial lithium concentration and phase ratio were evaluated by experiments. More than 90% of lithium could be extracted by saponified organic phase through three-stage countercurrent extraction. The loaded organic phase was first eluted by dilute HCl solution to remove nontarget sodium, and then stripped by 6 mol/L HCl at a large phase ratio to obtain lithium-rich solution with 4.322 mol/L lithium. The lithium-rich solution from the process could be used to prepare lithium carbonate or lithium chloride. The stripped organic phase can be recycled and no crud or emulsification was observed during the process. The extraction mechanism of HBTA-TOPO was investigated via FT-IR spectroscopy, and the results indicated the two extractants showed strong synergistic effect. The thermodynamic study revealed lithium extraction is an exothermic process, which meant lower temperature promotes extraction of lithium. This work provided a novel approach to recover lithium from effluent of spent lithium battery recycling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global lithium resources: relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits
Kesler, S. E., Gruber, P. W., Medina, P. A., Keoleian, G. A., Everson, M. P., & Wallington, T. J. (2012) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.006 · Cited by 1,140
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationChoubey, P. K., Chung, K.-S., Kim, M.-S., Lee, J.-C., & Srivastava, R. R. (2017) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2017.04.008 · Cited by 290
Extraction of lithium from salt lake brine containing boron using multistage centrifuge extractors
Shi, D., Zhang, L., Peng, X., Li, L., Song, F., Nie, F., Ji, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2018.04.029 · Cited by 167
Self-citationXiang, W., Liang, S., Zhou, Z., Qin, W., & Fei, W. (2017) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.04.007 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
Technology for the Recovery of Lithium from Geothermal Brines
Stringfellow, W. T., & Dobson, P. F. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14206805 · Cited by 293
Abidli, A., Huang, Y., Ben Rejeb, Z., Zaoui, A., & Park, C. B. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133102 · Cited by 194
Nikkhah, H., Ipekçi, D., Xiang, W., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., Li, B., McCutcheon, J. R., & Beykal, B. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Li, L., Rui, H., Shi, D., Peng, X., Ji, L., & Song, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 398
- Pages
- 122840
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3026157797
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium recovery from effluent of spent lithium battery recycling process using solvent extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122840
- The paper
- Zhang, L., Li, L., Rui, H., Shi, D., Peng, X., Ji, L., & Song, X. (2020). Lithium recovery from effluent of spent lithium battery recycling process using solvent extraction. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
