The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil
Abstract
Environmental concerns with liberal petroleum-based plastic use have led to demand for sustainable biodegradable alternatives. However, the inadequate end-of-life treatment of plastics may emit microplastics, either conventional or biodegradable, to the terrestrial environment. It is essential to evaluate the possible effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Therefore, we conducted a soil microcosm experiment with polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polylactide (PLA), or polybutylene succinate (PBS) microplastics. The soil microbiome and metabolome were evaluated via 16S rRNA gene sequencing, metagenomics, and untargeted metabolomics. We reported that the presence of conventional or biodegradable microplastics can significantly alter soil microbial community composition. Compared to the control soils, the microbiome in PBS and PLA amended soils exhibited higher potential for uptake of exogenous carbohydrates and amino acids, but a reduced capacity for related metabolic function, potentially due to catabolite repression. No differences in soil metabolome can be observed between conventional microplastic treatments and the control. The potential reason may be that the functional diversity was unaffected by PE and PS microplastics, while the biodegradable particles promoted the soil microbial multifunctionality. Our findings systematically shed light on the influence of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on soil microorganisms, facilitating microplastic regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · Cited by 65,548
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
DADA2: High–resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., & Holmes, S. P. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869 · Cited by 35,698
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Ogata, H., Goto, S., Sato, K., Fujibuchi, W., Bono, H., & Kanehisa, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29 · Cited by 31,232
Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2
Bolyen, E., Rideout, J. R., Dillon, M. R., Bokulich, N. A., Abnet, C. C., Al-Ghalith, G. A., Alexander, H., Alm, E. J., Arumugam, M., Asnicar, F., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 · Cited by 23,742
vegan: Community Ecology Package
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., et al. (2001) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vegan · Cited by 22,615
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · Cited by 18,606
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 · Cited by 16,192
Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences
Li, W., & Godzik, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · Cited by 11,410
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K., & Lam, T.-W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 · Cited by 9,893
Cited by
Fan, P., Yu, H., Xi, B., & Tan, W. (2022) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107244 · Cited by 341
Lian, Y., Liu, W., Shi, R., Zeb, A., Wang, Q., Li, J., Zheng, Z., & Tang, J. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129057 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Y., Duan, C., Cao, N., Ding, C., Huang, Y., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 424
- Issue
- Pt A
- Pages
- 127282
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3203758164
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127282
- The paper
- Sun, Y., Duan, C., Cao, N., Ding, C., Huang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.