Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil

Sun, Yuanze, Duan, Chongxue, Cao, Na, Ding, Changfeng, Huang, Yi, Wang, Jie·2022·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Environmental concerns with liberal petroleum-based plastic use have led to demand for sustainable biodegradable alternatives. However, the inadequate end-of-life treatment of plastics may emit microplastics, either conventional or biodegradable, to the terrestrial environment. It is essential to evaluate the possible effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Therefore, we conducted a soil microcosm experiment with polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polylactide (PLA), or polybutylene succinate (PBS) microplastics. The soil microbiome and metabolome were evaluated via 16S rRNA gene sequencing, metagenomics, and untargeted metabolomics. We reported that the presence of conventional or biodegradable microplastics can significantly alter soil microbial community composition. Compared to the control soils, the microbiome in PBS and PLA amended soils exhibited higher potential for uptake of exogenous carbohydrates and amino acids, but a reduced capacity for related metabolic function, potentially due to catabolite repression. No differences in soil metabolome can be observed between conventional microplastic treatments and the control. The potential reason may be that the functional diversity was unaffected by PE and PS microplastics, while the biodegradable particles promoted the soil microbial multifunctionality. Our findings systematically shed light on the influence of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on soil microorganisms, facilitating microplastic regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127282

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Y., Duan, C., Cao, N., Ding, C., Huang, Y., & Wang, J.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
424
Issue
Pt A
Pages
127282
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203758164
Cited by
282
References
59
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127282
The paper
Sun, Y., Duan, C., Cao, N., Ding, C., Huang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127282

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.