Cited by 102Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Anaerobic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in biosolids by acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6

Huang, Shan, Sima, Matthew, Long, Ying, Messenger, Courtney, Jaffé, Peter R.·2022·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Anaerobic incubations were performed with biosolids obtained from an industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) that contained perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances- (PFAS) free, laboratory-generated, biosolids that were spiked with PFOA. Biosolid slurries were incubated for 150 days as is, after augmenting with either Acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6 or ferrihydrite, or with both, Acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6 and ferrihydrite. Autoclaved controls were run in parallel. Only the biosolids augmented with both, Acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6 and ferrihydrite showed a decrease in the PFOA concentration, in excess of 50% (total, dissolved, and solid associated). Higher concentrations of PFOA in the biosolids spiked with PFOA and no previous PFAS exposure allowed to track the production of fluoride to verify PFOA defluorination. The buildup of fluoride over the incubation time was observed in these biosolid incubations spiked with PFOA. A significant increase in the concentration of perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) over the incubations of the filter cake samples from the industrial WWTP was observed, indicating the presence of a non-identified precursor in these biosolids. Results show that anaerobic incubation of PFAS contaminated biosolids, after augmentation with Fe(III) and Acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6 can result in PFAS defluorination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127699

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, S., Sima, M., Long, Y., Messenger, C., & Jaffé, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Chemours (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Jaffé, Peter R.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
424
Issue
Pt D
Pages
127699
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214204079
Cited by
102
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOA degradation, anaerobic biodegradation, biosolids, ferrihydrite, PFHpA, bioremediation
MeSH terms
Biosolids, Anaerobiosis, Caprylates, Ferric Compounds, Fluorocarbons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review