Cited by 760Statistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceHealthcare Policy and Management

Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data

Open access
Manning, Willard G., Basu, Anirban, Mullahy, John·2005·Journal of Health Economics

Abstract

There are two broad classes of models used to address the econometric problems caused by skewness in data commonly encountered in health care applications: (1) transformation to deal with skewness (e.g., ordinary least square (OLS) on ln(y)); and (2) alternative weighting approaches based on exponential conditional models (ECM) and generalized linear model (GLM) approaches. In this paper, we encompass these two classes of models using the three parameter generalized Gamma (GGM) distribution, which includes several of the standard alternatives as special cases-OLS with a normal error, OLS for the log-normal, the standard Gamma and exponential with a log link, and the Weibull. Using simulation methods, we find the tests of identifying distributions to be robust. The GGM also provides a potentially more robust alternative estimator to the standard alternatives. An example using inpatient expenditures is also analyzed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hosmer, D.W., and S. Lemeshow. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd Edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  2. McCullagh, P. and J.A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd Edition. London: Chapman and Hall.
  3. Meltzer, D.O., W.G. Manning, J. Morrison, T. Guth, A. Hernanadez, A. Dhar, L. Jin, and W. Levinson. 2002. Effects of hospitalist physicians on an academic general medicine service: results of a randomized trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 137(11): 866-874..

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manning, W. G., Basu, A., & Mullahy, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Manning, Willard G.
Venue
Journal of Health Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
465-488
ISSN
0167-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122533613
Cited by
760
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 42
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa012664-03)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1 R01 AA 12664-01 A2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
risk adjustment, logarithmic transformation, generalized linear models, hospital costs
MeSH terms
United States, Models, Statistical, Risk Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review