Cited by 355Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Ill health and retirement in Britain: A panel data-based analysis

Open access
Disney, Richard, Emmerson, Carl, Wakefield, Matthew·2006·Journal of Health Economics

Abstract

We examine the effect of ill health on retirement decisions in Britain, using the British Household Panel Survey (1991-1998). As self-reported health status is likely to be endogenous to the retirement decision, we instrument self-reported health by a constructed 'health stock' measure using a set of health indicator variables and personal characteristics, as suggested by Bound et al. (Bound, J., Schoenbaum, M., Stinebrickner, T.M., Waidmann, M., 1999. The dynamic effects of health on the labor force transitions of older workers. Labour Economics 6, 179-202). Using a range of econometric techniques, we show that adverse shocks to individual health stocks predict individual retirement behaviour among workers aged from 50 until state pension age. We compare responses of economic activity to constructed health measures with that arising using direct indicators of functional limitations and specific health problems. We also examine the dynamics of health shocks and whether adverse and positive health shocks have symmetric effects on transitions in and out of economic activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.05.004

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Disney, R., Emmerson, C., & Wakefield, M.
Affiliations
Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB)
Corresponding author
Disney, Richard
Venue
Journal of Health Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
621-649
ISSN
0167-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099575156
Cited by
355
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
61.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Essex
  • Nuffield Foundation
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-544-28-5001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
retirement, health problems, health shocks, self-reported health, older workers, labor force transitions, functional limitations, British Household Panel Survey
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, United Kingdom, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retirement, Databases as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review