Cited by 53Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHigher Education Research StudiesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Fraternity membership and binge drinking

DeSimone, Jeff·2007·Journal of Health Economics

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship that social fraternity and sorority membership has with binge drinking incidence and frequency among 18-24 year old full-time 4-year college students who participated in the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey. To net out unobserved heterogeneity, several measures of situational and total alcohol use are entered into the regressions as explanatory variables. Fraternity membership coefficients are substantially reduced in size, but remain large and highly significant, suggesting a causal effect on binge drinking. Otherwise, the estimates identify idiosyncratic selection into fraternities and binge drinking across students with similar overall drinking profiles. Particularly notable is that behavior by underage students appears to drive the relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.01.003

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DeSimone (2007) found even with controls, fraternity membership increased binge drinking.

    “Using a nationally representative subsample of data from the 1995 NCHRBS, DeSimone (2007) introduced controls as an attempt to account for high alcohol consumers being predisposition to join.Results suggested, even with these controls, that fraternity membership increased binge drinking.”
  • DeSimone (2007) found most conservative estimates imply fraternity membership raises prevalence and frequency of binge drinking by 15%-20%.

    “Specifically, the most conservative estimates imply fraternity membership raises the prevalence and frequency of binge drinking by 15%-20%.”
  • Even controlling for predisposition to drinking prior to college, fraternity membership nevertheless raises the prevalence of risky drinking behavior.

    “Even controlling for predisposition to drinking prior to college, others (e.g., DeSimone, 2007) have shown fraternity membership nevertheless raises the prevalence of risky drinking behavior.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeSimone, J.
Venue
Journal of Health Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
950-967
ISSN
0167-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024343495
Cited by
53
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
fraternity membership, sorority membership, binge drinking, university students, alcohol consumption, underage drinking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Risk-Taking, Social Conformity, United States, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review