Cited by 49Clinical practice guidelines implementationHepatitis C virus researchLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical practice guidelines of the European association for the study of the liver - advancing methodology but preserving practicability

Open access
Cornberg, Markus, Tacke, Frank, Karlsen, Tom H.·2019·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

The first EASL CPG on treatment of hepatitis C was published in 1999, at that time called a consensus statement. Since then, more than 30 CPGs on various liver diseases have been published. The EASL CPGs are extremely popular in Europe and beyond, making them a global reference for the current state-of-the art on diagnosis and management of liver diseases. As a consequence, the CPGs have been widely distributed, not only by open access publication in the Journal of Hepatology and on the EASL website, but also through EASL smartphone apps (i.e.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of these CPGs followed a standard operating procedure set out by EASL and meets the international standards for CPGs set out by the Guidelines International Network.

    “The development of these CPGs followed a standard operating procedure set out by EASL and meets the international standards for CPGs set out by the Guidelines International Network. 5”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The passage on EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) describes an EASL-standardized development method intended to comply with Guidelines International Network standards. It says CPGs *should* follow that method, but does not establish that the particular CPGs in the citing sentence did so or that they meet those standards. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. https://www.cebm.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CEBM-Levels-of-Evidence-2.1.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cornberg, M., Tacke, F., & Karlsen, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
Corresponding author
Cornberg, Markus
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
5-7
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900224060
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
European Association for the Study of the Liver, liver disease, hepatitis C treatment, guideline development methodology, feasibility, mobile application, consensus statement
MeSH terms
Europe, Gastroenterology, Humans, Liver Diseases, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review