The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Microvascular invasion (MVI) impairs surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As there is no single highly reliable factor to preoperatively predict MVI, we developed a computational approach integrating large-scale clinical and imaging modalities, especially radiomic features from contrast-enhanced CT, to predict MVI and clinical outcomes in patients with HCC. METHODS In total, 495 surgically resected patients were retrospectively included. MVI-related radiomic scores (R-scores) were built from 7,260 radiomic features in 6 target volumes. Six R-scores, 15 clinical factors, and 12 radiographic scores were integrated into a predictive model, the radiographic-radiomic (RR) model, with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Radiomics related to tumor size and intratumoral heterogeneity were the top-ranked MVI predicting features. The related R-scores showed significant differences according to MVI status (p <0.001). Regression analysis identified 8 MVI risk factors, including 5 radiographic features and an R-score. The R-score (odds ratio [OR] 2.34) was less important than tumor capsule (OR 5.12), tumor margin (OR4.20), and peritumoral enhancement (OR 3.03). The RR model using these predictors achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.909 in training/validation and 0.889 in the test set. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly different between the RR-predicted MVI-absent and MVI-present groups (median PFS: 49.5 vs. 12.9 months; median OS: 76.3 vs. 47.3 months). RR-computed MVI probability, histologic MVI, tumor size, and Edmondson-Steiner grade were independently associated with disease-specific recurrence and mortality. CONCLUSIONS The computational approach, integrating large-scale clinico-radiologic and radiomic features, demonstrates good performance for predicting MVI and clinical outcomes. However, radiomics with current CT imaging analysis protocols do not provide statistically significant added value to radiographic scores. LAY SUMMARY The most effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is surgical removal of the tumor but often recurrence occurs, partly due to the presence of microvascular invasion (MVI). Lacking a single highly reliable factor able to preoperatively predict MVI, we developed a computational approach to predict MVI and the long-term clinical outcome of patients with HCC. In particular, the added value of radiomics, a newly emerging form of radiography, was comprehensively investigated. This computational method can enhance the communication with the patient about the likely success of the treatment and guide clinical management, with the aim of finding drugs that reduce the risk of recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models
Vickers, A. J., & Elkin, E. B. (2006) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x06295361 · Cited by 6,341
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
Aerts, H. J. W. L., Velazquez, E. R., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., Haibe-Kains, B., Rietveld, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 · Cited by 5,132
Marrero, J. A., Kulik, L. M., Sirlin, C. B., Zhu, A. X., Finn, R. S., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., & Heimbach, J. K. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29913 · Cited by 4,539
Omata, M., Cheng, A.-L., Kokudo, N., Kudo, M., Lee, J. M., Jia, J., Tateishi, R., Han, K.-H., Chawla, Y. K., Shiina, S., et al. (2017) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9 · Cited by 2,171
Huang, Y.-Q., Liang, C.-H., He, L., Tian, J., Liang, C.-S., Chen, X., Ma, Z.-L., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.9128 · Cited by 1,765
Limkin, E. J., Sun, R., Dercle, L., Zacharaki, E. I., Robert, C., Reuzé, S., Schernberg, A., Paragios, N., Deutsch, E., & Ferté, C. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx034 · Cited by 757
Huang, Y., Liu, Z., He, L., Chen, X., Pan, D., Ma, Z., Liang, C., Tian, J., & Liang, C. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152234 · Cited by 743
Rodríguez-Perálvarez, M., Luong, T. V., Andreana, L., Meyer, T., Dhillon, A. P., & Burroughs, A. K. (2013) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2513-1 · Cited by 657
Lei, Z., Li, J., Wu, D., Xia, Y., Wang, Q., Si, A., Wang, K., Wan, X., Lau, W. Y., Wu, M., et al. (2016) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4257 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2019 Edition)
Zhou, J., Sun, H., Wang, Z., Cong, W., Wang, J., Zeng, M., Zhou, W., Bie, P., Liu, L., Wen, T., et al. (2020) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000509424 · Cited by 800
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition)
Zhou, J., Sun, H., Wang, Z., Cong, W., Zeng, M., Zhou, W., Bie, P., Liu, L., Wen, T., Kuang, M., et al. (2023) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000530495 · Cited by 477
Self-citationZhou, Q., Chen, Z.-H., Cao, Y.-H., & Peng, S. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00524-2 · Cited by 126
Xie, T., Wang, X., Li, M., Tong, T., Yu, X., & Zhou, Z. (2020) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06600-2 · Cited by 100
Liao, H., Xiong, T., Peng, J., Xu, L., Liao, M., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Yuan, K., & Zeng, Y. (2020) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-019-08190-1 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X., Zhang, H.-L., Liu, Q.-P., Sun, S.-W., Zhang, J., Zhu, F.-P., Yang, G., Yan, X., Zhang, Y.-D., & Liu, X.-S.
- Venue
- Journal of Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1133-1144
- ISSN
- 0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921899076
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 47.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.023
- The paper
- Xu, X., Zhang, H.-L., Liu, Q.-P., Sun, S.-W., Zhang, J., Zhu, F.-P., Yang, G., Yan, X., Zhang, Y.-D., & Liu, X.-S. (2019). Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.