Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy – development and validation of the CRAFITY score

Open access
Scheiner, Bernhard, Pomej, Katharina, Kirstein, Martha M., Hucke, Florian, Finkelmeier, Fabian, Waidmann, Oliver, Himmelsbach, Vera, Schulze, Kornelius, von Felden, Johann, Fründt, Thorben W., Stadler, Marc, Heinzl, Harald, Shmanko, Kateryna, Spahn, Stephan, Radu, Pompilia, Siebenhüner, Alexander R., Mertens, Joachim C., Rahbari, Nuh N., Kütting, Fabian, Waldschmidt, Dirk-Thomas, Ebert, Matthias P., Teufel, Andreas, De Dosso, Sara, Pinato, David J., Pressiani, Tiziana, Meischl, Tobias, Balcar, Lorenz, Müller, Christian, Mandorfer, Mattias, Reiberger, Thomas, Trauner, Michael, Personeni, Nicola, Rimassa, Lorenza, Bitzer, Michael, Trojan, Jörg, Weinmann, Arndt, Wege, Henning, Dufour, Jean-François, Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus, Vogel, Arndt, Pinter, Matthias·2022·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic front-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, biomarkers that predict treatment success and survival remain an unmet need. METHODS: Patients with HCC put on PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy were included in a training set (n = 190; 6 European centers) and a validation set (n = 102; 8 European centers). We investigated the prognostic value of baseline variables on overall survival using a Cox model in the training set and developed the easily applicable CRAFITY (CRP and AFP in ImmunoTherapY) score. The score was validated in the independent, external cohort, and evaluated in a cohort of patients treated with sorafenib (n = 204). RESULTS: Baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein ≥100 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7; p = 0.007) and C-reactive protein ≥1 mg/dl (HR, 1.7; p = 0.007) were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis and were used to develop the CRAFITY score. Patients who fulfilled no criterion (0 points; CRAFITY-low) had the longest median overall survival (27.6 (95% CI 19.5-35.8) months), followed by those fulfilling 1 criterion (1 point; CRAFITY-intermediate; 11.3 (95% CI 8.0-14.6) months), and patients meeting both criteria (2 points; CRAFITY-high; 6.4 (95% CI 4.8-8.1) months; p <0.001). Additionally, best radiological response (complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease) was significantly better in patients with lower CRAFITY score (CRAFITY-low: 9%/20%/52%/20% vs. CRAFITY-intermediate: 3%/25%/36%/36% vs. CRAFITY-high: 2%/15%/22%/61%; p = 0.003). These results were confirmed in the independent validation set and in different subgroups, including Child-Pugh A and B, performance status 0 and ≥1, and first-line and later lines. In the sorafenib cohort, CRAFITY was associated with survival, but not radiological response. CONCLUSIONS: The CRAFITY score is associated with survival and radiological response in patients receiving PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The score may help with patient counseling but requires prospective validation. LAY SUMMARY: The immunotherapy-based regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic first-line therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Biomarkers to predict treatment outcome are an unmet need in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC. We developed and externally validated a score that predicts outcome in patients with HCC undergoing immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Scheiner, B., Pomej, K., Kirstein, M. M., Hucke, F., Finkelmeier, F., Waidmann, O., Himmelsbach, V., Schulze, K., von Felden, J., Fründt, T. W., Stadler, M., Heinzl, H., Shmanko, K., Spahn, S., Radu, P., Siebenhüner, A. R., Mertens, J. C., Rahbari, N. N., Kütting, F., Waldschmidt, D.-T., Ebert, M. P., Teufel, A., De Dosso, S., Pinato, D. J., Pressiani, T., Meischl, T., Balcar, L., Müller, C., Mandorfer, M., Reiberger, T., Trauner, M., Personeni, N., Rimassa, L., Bitzer, M., Trojan, J., Weinmann, A., Wege, H., Dufour, J.-F., Peck-Radosavljevic, M., Vogel, A., & Pinter, M.
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
353-363
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205914248
Cited by
303
References
57
FWCI
22.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy – development and validation of the CRAFITY score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035
The paper
Scheiner, B., Pomej, K., Kirstein, M. M., Hucke, F., Finkelmeier, F., Waidmann, O., Himmelsbach, V., Schulze, K., von Felden, J., Fründt, T. W., Stadler, M., Heinzl, H., Shmanko, K., Spahn, S., Radu, P., Siebenhüner, A. R., Mertens, J. C., Rahbari, N. N., Kütting, F., . . . Pinter, M. (2022). Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy – development and validation of the CRAFITY score. Journal of Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.