The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy – development and validation of the CRAFITY score
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic front-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, biomarkers that predict treatment success and survival remain an unmet need. METHODS: Patients with HCC put on PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy were included in a training set (n = 190; 6 European centers) and a validation set (n = 102; 8 European centers). We investigated the prognostic value of baseline variables on overall survival using a Cox model in the training set and developed the easily applicable CRAFITY (CRP and AFP in ImmunoTherapY) score. The score was validated in the independent, external cohort, and evaluated in a cohort of patients treated with sorafenib (n = 204). RESULTS: Baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein ≥100 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7; p = 0.007) and C-reactive protein ≥1 mg/dl (HR, 1.7; p = 0.007) were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis and were used to develop the CRAFITY score. Patients who fulfilled no criterion (0 points; CRAFITY-low) had the longest median overall survival (27.6 (95% CI 19.5-35.8) months), followed by those fulfilling 1 criterion (1 point; CRAFITY-intermediate; 11.3 (95% CI 8.0-14.6) months), and patients meeting both criteria (2 points; CRAFITY-high; 6.4 (95% CI 4.8-8.1) months; p <0.001). Additionally, best radiological response (complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease) was significantly better in patients with lower CRAFITY score (CRAFITY-low: 9%/20%/52%/20% vs. CRAFITY-intermediate: 3%/25%/36%/36% vs. CRAFITY-high: 2%/15%/22%/61%; p = 0.003). These results were confirmed in the independent validation set and in different subgroups, including Child-Pugh A and B, performance status 0 and ≥1, and first-line and later lines. In the sorafenib cohort, CRAFITY was associated with survival, but not radiological response. CONCLUSIONS: The CRAFITY score is associated with survival and radiological response in patients receiving PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The score may help with patient counseling but requires prospective validation. LAY SUMMARY: The immunotherapy-based regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic first-line therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Biomarkers to predict treatment outcome are an unmet need in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC. We developed and externally validated a score that predicts outcome in patients with HCC undergoing immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Meng, W., Li, X., Bai, Z., Li, Y., Yuan, J., Liu, T., Yan, J., Zhou, W., Zhu, K., Zhang, H., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090660 · Cited by 43
RetractedHallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Austin, P. C. (2011) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 · Cited by 12,242
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Sica, A., & Balkwill, F. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07205 · Cited by 11,399
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Finn, R. S., Qin, S., Ikeda, M., Galle, P. R., Ducreux, M., Kim, T.-Y., Kudo, M., Breder, V., Merle, P., Kaseb, A. O., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1915745 · Cited by 7,470
Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures
Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., Pencina, M. J., & Kattan, M. W. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181c30fb2 · Cited by 5,170
Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Lencioni, R., & Llovet, J. (2010) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/s-0030-1247132 · Cited by 4,329
A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time
Schemper, M., & Smith, T. L. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(96)00075-x · Cited by 2,575
Cited by
Vogel, A., Meyer, T., Sapisochin, G., Salem, R., & Saborowski, A. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01200-4 · Cited by 2,427
Self-citationEASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Sangro, B., Argemi, J., Ronot, M., Paradis, V., Meyer, T., Mazzaferro, V., Jepsen, P., Golfieri, R., Galle, P., Dawson, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028 · Cited by 985
Global epidemiology of alcohol-associated cirrhosis and HCC: trends, projections and risk factors
Huang, D. Q., Mathurin, P., Cortez-Pinto, H., & Loomba, R. (2023) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-022-00688-6 · Cited by 553
Precision treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Yang, X., Yang, C., Zhang, S., Geng, H., Zhu, A. X., Bernards, R., Qin, W., Fan, J., Wang, C., & Gao, Q. (2024) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.01.007 · Cited by 429
Biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic options in hepatocellular carcinoma
Chan, Y.-T., Zhang, C., Wu, J., Lu, P., Xu, L., Yuan, H., Feng, Y., Chen, Z.-S., & Wang, N. (2024) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-024-02101-z · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheiner, B., Pomej, K., Kirstein, M. M., Hucke, F., Finkelmeier, F., Waidmann, O., Himmelsbach, V., Schulze, K., von Felden, J., Fründt, T. W., Stadler, M., Heinzl, H., Shmanko, K., Spahn, S., Radu, P., Siebenhüner, A. R., Mertens, J. C., Rahbari, N. N., Kütting, F., Waldschmidt, D.-T., Ebert, M. P., Teufel, A., De Dosso, S., Pinato, D. J., Pressiani, T., Meischl, T., Balcar, L., Müller, C., Mandorfer, M., Reiberger, T., Trauner, M., Personeni, N., Rimassa, L., Bitzer, M., Trojan, J., Weinmann, A., Wege, H., Dufour, J.-F., Peck-Radosavljevic, M., Vogel, A., & Pinter, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 353-363
- ISSN
- 0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3205914248
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 22.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy – development and validation of the CRAFITY score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035
- The paper
- Scheiner, B., Pomej, K., Kirstein, M. M., Hucke, F., Finkelmeier, F., Waidmann, O., Himmelsbach, V., Schulze, K., von Felden, J., Fründt, T. W., Stadler, M., Heinzl, H., Shmanko, K., Spahn, S., Radu, P., Siebenhüner, A. R., Mertens, J. C., Rahbari, N. N., Kütting, F., . . . Pinter, M. (2022). Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy – development and validation of the CRAFITY score. Journal of Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.