The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Pleistocene colonization of northeastern Europe: a report on recent research
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that northeastern Europe was occupied by humans significantly earlier than previously thought. Some traces of human presence in the European Arctic even date back to about 35-40 ka. This paper discusses the Middle and early Upper Palaeolithic (EUP) assemblages from this area within the local context of their environmental characteristics, as well as their implications for our views on the occupational history of northern environments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern humans were present, at least on a seasonal basis, in the European Arctic before 40 ka.
“Modern humans were present, at least on a seasonal basis, in the European Arctic before 40 ka”
From Beringia and the peopling of the Western Hemisphere (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Modern humans were probably present on a year-round basis in arctic Siberia and Beringia by 33 ka.
“and probably on a year-round basis in arctic Siberia and Beringia by 33 ka [51,52].”
From Beringia and the peopling of the Western Hemisphere (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beringia and the peopling of the Western Hemisphere
Hoffecker, J. F., Elias, S. A., Scott, G. R., O'Rourke, D. H., Hlusko, L. J., Potapova, O., Pitulko, V., Pavlova, E., Bourgeon, L., & Vachula, R. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.2246 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- PAVLOV, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Human Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 3-17
- ISSN
- 0047-2484
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
