Cited by 23Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

A mid-Holocene AMS 14C date for the presumed upper Pleistocene human skeleton from Peers Cave, South Africa

Stynder, Deano D., Brock, Fiona, Sealy, Judith C., Wurz, Sarah, Morris, Alan G., Volman, Thomas P.·2009·Journal of Human Evolution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.11.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acheulean artefacts occur in the diamond-bearing colluvial sediments, the Younger Gravels (Rietputs A and B), termed Stratum 2 (a and b), which include Victoria West cores and some of the largest handaxes ever discovered in South Africa.

    “Acheulean artefacts occur in the diamond-bearing colluvial sediments, the Younger Gravels (Rietputs A and B), which they termed Stratum 2 (a and b), and which include Victoria West cores and some of the largest handaxes ever discovered in South Africa.”

    From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • There is no fossil bone preservation at the main Canteen Kopje locality.

    “given that there is no fossil bone preservation at this locality.”

    From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Previous claims that the skull fragments came from the Younger Gravels beneath the Hutton Sands within the main Canteen Kopje site seem unlikely, given that there is no fossil bone preservation at this locality.

    “Previous claims that the skull fragments came from the Younger Gravels beneath the Hutton Sands within the main Canteen Kopje site seem unlikely, given that there is no fossil bone preservation at this locality.”

    From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Following recent excavations at Canteen Kopje within the Provincial Heritage Site zone, Beaumont and McNabb identified three main archaeological horizons.

    “Following recent excavations at Canteen Kopje within the Provincial Heritage Site zone (Figure 8), Beaumont and McNabb 15,16,53,54 identified three main archaeological horizons.”

    From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stynder, D. D., Brock, F., Sealy, J. C., Wurz, S., Morris, A. G., & Volman, T. P.
Affiliations
  • Iziko Museums of South Africa (ZA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Stynder, Deano D.
Venue
Journal of Human Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
431-434
ISSN
0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082457175
Cited by
23
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NRCF010002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
skull morphology, 3D geometric morphometrics, virtual reconstruction, mid-Holocene
MeSH terms
Archaeology, Fossils, Humans, Male, South Africa, Radiometric Dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review