Intergroup cannibalism in the European Early Pleistocene: The range expansion and imbalance of power hypotheses
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we compare cannibalism in chimpanzees, modern humans, and in archaeological cases with cannibalism inferred from evidence from the Early Pleistocene assemblage of level TD6 of Gran Dolina (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). The cannibalism documented in level TD6 mainly involves the consumption of infants and other immature individuals. The human induced modifications on Homo antecessor and deer remains suggest that butchering processes were similar for both taxa, and the remains were discarded on the living floor in the same way. This finding implies that a group of hominins that used the Gran Dolina cave periodically hunted and consumed individuals from another group. However, the age distribution of the cannibalized hominins in the TD6 assemblage is not consistent with that from other cases of exo-cannibalism by human/hominin groups. Instead, it is similar to the age profiles seen in cannibalism associated with intergroup aggression in chimpanzees. For this reason, we use an analogy with chimpanzees to propose that the TD6 hominins mounted low-risk attacks on members of other groups to defend access to resources within their own territories and to try and expand their territories at the expense of neighboring groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fossils of hominins at Gran Dolina (Spain) 800,000 years ago show butchery marks, indicating cannibalism.
“For example, fossils of hominins that lived at Gran Dolina (Spain) 800,000 years ago show butchery marks, an indication of cannibalism.”
From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Saladie et al., 2012
This conclusion supports interpretations from Gran Dolina relating to Homo antecessor.
“Certainly, this conclusion would support interpretations from Gran Dolina relating to Homo antecessor613.”
From Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic (2017) · cites this paper as [6]
The taphonomic evidence closely matches the indicators documented in other prehistoric assemblages interpreted as cases of cannibalism.
“Taken together, this taphonomic evidence closely matches the indicators documented in other prehistoric assemblages interpreted as cases of cannibalism16,27,28,33,36,42,43,50–52.”
From Evidence of neolithic cannibalism among farming communities at El Mirador cave, Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 113 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Saladié, P., Huguet, R., Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A., Cáceres, I., Esteban-Nadal, M., Arsuaga, J. L., Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., & Carbonell, E.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (ES)
- Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Saladié, Palmira
- Venue
- Journal of Human Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 682-695
- ISSN
- 0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101810103
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 26.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.ucm.es
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Keywords
- Early Pleistocene, Homo antecessor, Gran Dolina, butchery, intergroup aggression, range expansion, power imbalance, territorial defense, resource competition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Archaeology, Bone and Bones, Cannibalism, Pan troglodytes, Female, Fossils, Humans, Male, Spain, Hominidae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review