Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Use of ATP bioluminescence to survey the spread of aerosol and splatter during dental treatments

Watanabe, A., Tamaki, N., Yokota, K., Matsuyama, M., Kokeguchi, S.·2018·Journal of Hospital Infection

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aerosols contain mainly gram-positive organisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp.), gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria, endospore-forming and nonspore-forming bacteria, and mould fungi (e.g., Cladosporium and Penicillium).

    “Aerosols contain mainly gram‐positive organisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp.), gram‐positive, rod‐shaped bacteria, and those creating endospore as well as nonspore‐forming bacteria and mould fungi (e.g., Cladosporium and Penicillium; Kobza, Pastuszka, & Bragoszewska, 2018; Watanabe, Tamaki, Yokota, Matsuyama, & Kokeguchi, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Monaghan, 2016, Emerging infections – implications for dental care, Br Dent J, 221, 13, 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.486 · DOI
  2. Singh, 2016, Aerosol – a health hazard during ultrasonic scaling: a clinico-microbiological study, Indian J Dent Res, 27, 160, 10.4103/0970-9290.183131 · DOI
  3. Szymańska, 2007, Dental bioaerosol as an occupational hazard in a dentist'sworkplace, Ann Agric Environ Med, 14, 203
  4. Rautemaa, 2006, Bacterial aerosols in dental practice – a potential hospital infection problem?, J Hosp Infect, 64, 76, 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.011 · DOI
  5. Kohn, 2003, Personal protective equipment. Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings – 2003, MMWR Recomm Rep, 52, 1
  6. Alfa, 2015, Adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP)-based cleaning monitoring in health care: how rapidly does environmental ATP deteriorate?, J Hosp Infect, 90, 59, 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.01.020 · DOI
  7. Osimani, 2014, Bioluminescence ATP monitoring for the routine assessment of food contact surface cleanliness in a university canteen, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 11, 10824, 10.3390/ijerph111010824 · DOI
  8. Watanabe, 2016, Monitoring of bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence, J Hosp Infect, 94, 393, 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.001 · DOI
  9. Afzha, 2016, Microbial contamination of contact lenses after scaling and root planing using ultrasonic scalers with and without protective eyewear: a clinical and microbiological study, J Indian Soc Periodontol, 20, 273, 10.4103/0972-124X.182599 · DOI
  10. Farrier, 2006, Eye safety in operative dentistry – a study in general dental practice, Br Dent J, 200, 218, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813257 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Watanabe, A., Tamaki, N., Yokota, K., Matsuyama, M., & Kokeguchi, S.
Venue
Journal of Hospital Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
303-305
ISSN
0195-6701
Cited by
44
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K12008)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review