Residual Motor Signal in Long-Term Human Severed Peripheral Nerves and Feasibility of Neural Signal-Controlled Artificial Limb
Abstract
Purpose The residual motor pathways after amputation have not been fully elucidated. We sampled potentials from peripheral nerve stumps with intrafascicular electrodes to study residual motor transmission and explore the feasibility of nerve signal-controlled artificial limbs.Methods Six intrafascicular electrodes were inserted into the ulnar, radial, and median nerves in the stump of an amputee. An electrode was placed outside the fascicle as a reference. Potentials from 4 of the 6 electrodes per trial were monitored using a 4-channel electromyogram machine, and 32 groups of electrophysiologic tests were conducted under volitional control. Actions included finger extension and flexion, forearm pronation and supination, and wrist extension and flexion. Each action was carried out with light, intermediate, and full efforts. Then, 2 of 6 electrodes randomly chosen per trial were interfaced to a nerve signal-controlled artificial limb. Finger extension and flexion of the prosthesis were tested under volitional control.Results The volitional motor nerve potentials uniquely associated with the missing limb were recorded successfully with intrafascicular electrodes. The signal amplitude from the radial nerve was 5.5 microV +/- 0.8 (mean +/- SD), which was greater than the amplitudes from the ulnar (2.5 microV +/- 0.4) and median (2.2 microV +/- 0.3) nerves. Under volitional control of the subject, finger extension of the artificial limb was triggered by the radial nerve signal, but the remaining actions were unsuccessful.Conclusions The long-term amputee was able to generate motor neuron activity related to phantom limb movement. Intrafascicular electrodes can be used to monitor residual motor nerve activity in the stump, and the amplitude may predict successful control of artificial limbs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intrafascicular electrodes such as TIME and LIFE transduce signals with amplitudes below 100 μVpp.
“For example, intrafascicular electrodes, such as the transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) and the longitudinal intrafascicular electrode (LIFE), transduce signals that have amplitudes less than 100 µVpp [62, 66, 71, 79, 82, 109].”
From Implantable neurotechnologies: a review of integrated circuit neural amplifiers (2016) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Jia, X., Koenig, M. A., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Chen, T., & Chen, Z.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jia, Xiaofeng
- Venue
- The Journal of Hand Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 657-666
- ISSN
- 0363-5023 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170038849
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal Of Hand Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- amputation, intrafascicular electrodes, radial nerve, ulnar nerve, median nerve, phantom limb movement, motor neuron activity, upper limb amputation
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Adult, Amputation Stumps, Artificial Limbs, Biofeedback, Psychology, Brachial Plexus, Efferent Pathways, Electrodes, Implanted, Electromyography, Feasibility Studies, Hand, Humans, Male, Movement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review