Cited by 39Orthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFoot and Ankle SurgeryReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effectiveness of early mobilization after tendon transfers in the hand: A systematic review

Abstract

Study design Systematic review.Introduction Over the past decade, early mobilization (initiated within a week) has become an increasing trend in postoperative rehabilitation after tendon transfer surgery in the hand. However, there are no published reviews summarizing the effectiveness of early mobilization protocols in comparison with conventional immobilization in tendon transfer rehabilitation.Purpose To systematically review available evidence on the effectiveness of early mobilization protocols to conventional immobilization protocol after tendon transfers in the hand.Methods A literature search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, PEDro, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases was conducted (1980 to date). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, and other study designs were included. Six articles were eligible for inclusion in the analysis (five RCTs and one retrospective study) and 260 articles that did not meet inclusion criteria were excluded. Level of evidence (Center for Evidence-based Medicine) and methodological quality (Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale [SEQES] score) of each study were assessed by two independent reviewers.Results This review found three high quality trials (SEQES score: 35-43 of 48), with level 1b and 2b evidence, supporting early mobilization of tendon transfers. The literature reports reduced total cost, total rehabilitation time, and demonstrates that early mobilization is a safe approach with no incidence of tendon ruptures or insertion pull out. In the initial phase of rehabilitation, outcomes like range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, total active motion of digits, deformity correction, and tendon transfer integration were significantly superior with early mobilization compared with immobilization. However, in the long term, these outcomes were similar in both the groups, suggesting that early mobilization protocol improves hand function in the initial phase of rehabilitation (four weeks) and the long-term results (two months to one year) are equivalent to immobilization.Conclusions Based on a limited number of small studies, there is evidence of short-term benefit for early mobilization, but inconclusive findings for longer-term outcomes. Until the body of evidence increases, clinicians should consider the clinical context, their experience in optimizing patient outcomes after surgery, and the patient's preferences when selecting between early and late mobilization after tendon transfer.Level of evidence 2a.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jht.2012.06.006

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine—Levels of Evidence (2009). Available at: http://cebm.net. Accessed Feb 14, 2011.
  2. Brandsma, 2011, In ‘Letters to the editor’, Hand Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, J Hand Surg, 36A, 753

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sultana, S. S., MacDermid, J. C., Grewal, R., & Rath, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Hi-Tech Medical College & Hospital (IN)
Venue
Journal of Hand Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
0894-1130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082683752
Cited by
39
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hand Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Keywords
early mobilization, tendon transfer, hand surgery, postoperative rehabilitation, immobilization, range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, deformity correction, hand function
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Hand, Hand Injuries, Humans, Immobilization, Postoperative Care, Tendon Injuries, Tendon Transfer, Range of Motion, Articular, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review