Cited by 64Orthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

The effectiveness of joint-protection programs on pain, hand function, and grip strength levels in patients with hand arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bobos, Pavlos, Nazari, Goris, Szekeres, Mike, Lalone, Emily A., Ferreira, Louis, MacDermid, Joy C.·2019·Journal of Hand Therapy

Abstract

Study design Systematic review with meta-analysis.Introduction Joint protection (JP) has been developed as a self-management intervention to assist people with hand arthritis to improve occupational performance and minimize joint deterioration over time.Purpose of the study We examined the effectiveness between JP and usual care/control on pain, hand function, and grip strength levels for people with hand osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.Methods A search was performed in 5 databases from January 1990 to February 2017. Two independent assessors applied Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and a Grading of Recommendations Assessement, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was adopted.Results For pain levels at short term, we found similar effects between JP and control standardized mean difference (SMD; -0.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.42 to 0.42, I 2 = 49%), and at midterm and long-term follow-up, JP was favored over usual care SMD (-0.32, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.11, I 2 = 0) and SMD (-0.27, 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.12, I 2 = 9%), respectively. For function levels at midterm and long-term follow-up, JP was favored over usual care SMD (-0.49, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.22, I 2 = 34%) and SMD (-0.31, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.11, I 2 = 56%), respectively. For grip strength levels, at long term, JP was inferior over usual care mean difference (0.93, 95% CI: -0.74 to 2.61, I 2 = 0%).Conclusions Evidence of very low to low quality indicates that the effects of JP programs compared with usual care/control on pain and hand function are too small to be clinically important at short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-ups for people with hand arthritis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jht.2018.09.012

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobos, P., Nazari, G., Szekeres, M., Lalone, E. A., Ferreira, L., & MacDermid, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • St Joseph's Health Care (CA)
Corresponding author
Bobos, Pavlos
Venue
Journal of Hand Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
194-211
ISSN
0894-1130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906175097
Cited by
64
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hand Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • CIHR
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
joint protection, hand arthritis, hand osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, pain, hand function, grip strength, self-management interventions, usual care comparison
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Ergonomics, Orthotic Devices, Osteoarthritis, Pain Measurement, Patient Education as Topic, Self-Help Devices, Hand Strength, Hand Joints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review